Cited by 79Cardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsAortic Disease and Treatment Approaches

Multi-modality imaging in aortic stenosis: an EACVI clinical consensus document

Open access
Dweck, Marc R, Loganath, Krithika, Bing, Rong, Treibel, Thomas A, McCann, Gerry P, Newby, David E, Leipsic, Jonathon, Fraccaro, Chiara +9 more·2023·European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging

Abstract

In this EACVI clinical scientific update, we will explore the current use of multi-modality imaging in the diagnosis, risk stratification, and follow-up of patients with aortic stenosis, with a particular focus on recent developments and future directions. Echocardiography is and will likely remain the key method of diagnosis and surveillance of aortic stenosis providing detailed assessments of valve haemodynamics and the cardiac remodelling response. Computed tomography (CT) is already widely used in the planning of transcutaneous aortic valve implantation. We anticipate its increased use as an anatomical adjudicator to clarify disease severity in patients with discordant echocardiographic measurements. CT calcium scoring is currently used for this purpose; however, contrast CT techniques are emerging that allow identification of both calcific and fibrotic valve thickening. Additionally, improved assessments of myocardial decompensation with echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and CT will become more commonplace in our routine assessment of aortic stenosis. Underpinning all of this will be widespread application of artificial intelligence. In combination, we believe this new era of multi-modality imaging in aortic stenosis will improve the diagnosis, follow-up, and timing of intervention in aortic stenosis as well as potentially accelerate the development of the novel pharmacological treatments required for this disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ehjci/jead153

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Assessing aortic valve calcification using a calcium score derived from non-contrast CT has proven valuable.

    “In such cases, assessing aortic valve calcification using a calcium score derived from non-contrast computed tomography (CT) has proven to be valuable4–6.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dweck, M. R., Loganath, K., Bing, R., Treibel, T. A., McCann, G. P., Newby, D. E., Leipsic, J., Fraccaro, C., Paolisso, P., Cosyns, B., Habib, G., Cavalcante, J., Donal, E., Lancellotti, P., Clavel, M.-A., Otto, C. M., & Pibarot, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • St Bartholomew's Hospital (GB)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • St. Paul's Hospital (CA)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital (BE)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (BE)
  • Hôpital de la Timone (FR)
  • Abbott Northwestern Hospital (US)
  • CIC Rennes (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège (BE)
  • Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (CA)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec/Québec Heart and Lung Institute , 2725 Ch Ste-Foy, Québec, QC G1V 4G5 ,
Corresponding author
Dweck, Marc R
Venue
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
Published
2023-07-03
Volume
24
Issue
11
Pages
1430-1443
ISSN
  • 2047-2404 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-2412
OpenAlex
W4382918014
Cited by
79
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 4
FWCI
15.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Corpus Université Laval (Université Laval) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Funders
British Heart Foundation (CH/09/002/26360, SP/20/3/35123, FS/19/35/34374)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Keywords
aortic stenosis, multi-modality imaging, echocardiography, computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance, CT calcium scoring, contrast-enhanced CT, cardiac remodeling, risk stratification, artificial intelligence, valve calcification
MeSH terms
Aortic Valve, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Consensus, Multimodal Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review