Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 290 of the 290 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gender differences in the effects of cardiovascular drugs

Open access
Tamargo, J, Rosano, G, Walther, T, Duarte, J, Niessner, A, Kaski, JC, Ceconi, C, Drexel, H, Kjeldsen, K, Savarese, G, Torp-Pedersen, C, Atar, D, Lewis, BS, Agewall, S·2017·European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy

Abstract

Although sex-specific differences in cardiovascular medicine are well known, the exact influences of sex on the effect of cardiovascular drugs remain unclear. Women and men differ in body composition and physiology (hormonal influences during the menstrual cycle, menopause, and pregnancy) and they present differences in drug pharmacokinetics (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion) and pharmacodynamics, so that is not rare that they may respond differently to cardiovascular drugs. Furthermore, women are also less often treated with evidence-based drugs thereby preventing optimization of therapeutics for women of all ages, experience more relevant adverse drug reactions than men, and remain underrepresented in most clinical trials. Thus, current guidelines for prevention, diagnosis, and medical treatment for cardiovascular diseases are based on trials conducted predominantly in middle-aged men. A better understanding of these sex-related differences is fundamental to improve the safety and efficacy of cardiovascular drugs and for developing proper individualized cardiovascular therapeutic strategies both in men and women. This review briefly summarizes gender differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cardiovascular drugs and provides recommendations to close the gaps in our understanding of sex-specific differences in drug efficacy and safety.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvw042

Cites

290 of 290 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 290 references

Cited by

See all 317

Metadata

Authors
Tamargo, J., Rosano, G., Walther, T., Duarte, J., Niessner, A., Kaski, J., Ceconi, C., Drexel, H., Kjeldsen, K., Savarese, G., Torp-Pedersen, C., Atar, D., Lewis, B., & Agewall, S.
Venue
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy
Published
2017-02-28
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
163-182
ISSN
  • 2055-6837 (ISSN-L)
  • 2055-6845
OpenAlex
W2592398938
Cited by
317
References
290
FWCI
13.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender differences in the effects of cardiovascular drugs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvw042
The paper
Tamargo, J., Rosano, G., Walther, T., Duarte, J., Niessner, A., Kaski, J., Ceconi, C., Drexel, H., Kjeldsen, K., Savarese, G., Torp-Pedersen, C., Atar, D., Lewis, B., & Agewall, S. (2017). Gender differences in the effects of cardiovascular drugs. European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvw042

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.