Cited by 68Cardiac Arrest and ResuscitationPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Characteristics of neighbourhoods with high incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and low bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation rates in England

Open access
Brown, Terry P, Booth, Scott, Hawkes, Claire A, Soar, Jasmeet, Mark, Julian, Mapstone, James, Fothergill, Rachael T, Black, Sarah +4 more·2019·European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes

Abstract

Aims: The aim of the project was to identify the neighbourhood characteristics of areas in England where out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) incidence was high and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) was low using registry data. Methods and results: Analysis was based on 67 219 cardiac arrest events between 1 April 2013 and 31 December 2015. Arrest locations were geocoded to give latitude/longitude. Postcode district was chosen as the proxy for neighbourhood. High-risk neighbourhoods, where OHCA incidence based on residential population was >127.6/100 000, or based on workday population was >130/100 000, and BCPR in bystander witnessed arrest was <60% were observed to have: a greater mean residential population density, a lower workday population density, a lower rural-urban index, a higher proportion of people in routine occupations and lower proportion in managerial occupations, a greater proportion of population from ethnic minorities, a greater proportion of people not born in UK, and greater level of deprivation. High-risk areas were observed in the North-East, Yorkshire, South-East, and Birmingham. Conclusion: The study identified neighbourhood characteristics of high-risk areas that experience a high incidence of OHCA and low bystander resuscitation rate that could be targeted for programmes of training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcy026

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • COSCA identified three outcomes: survival at discharge/30-days; modified Rankin score at discharge/30-days; and health-related quality of life at 180-days/1year.

    “COSCA identified three outcomes: survival at discharge/30-days; modified Rankin score at discharge/30-days; and health-related quality of life at 180-days/1year.”
  • ILCOR developed a cardiac arrest core outcome set (COSCA) in a process that involved patients, their partners, clinicians and researchers.

    “To address this issue, ILCOR developed a cardiac arrest core outcome set (COSCA) in a process that involved patients, their partners, clinicians and researchers. 305”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, T. P., Booth, S., Hawkes, C. A., Soar, J., Mark, J., Mapstone, J., Fothergill, R. T., Black, S., Pocock, H., Bichmann, A., Gunson, I., & Perkins, G. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • North Bristol NHS Trust (GB)
  • Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust (GB)
  • Public Health England (GB)
  • London Ambulance Service NHS Trust (GB)
  • South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust (GB)
  • West Midlands Ambulance Service University NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Brown, Terry P
Venue
European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes
Published
2018-06-28
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
51-62
ISSN
  • 2058-1742 (ISSN-L)
  • 2058-5225
OpenAlex
W2810145444
Cited by
68
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
FWCI
7.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • amber - ambulance research repository (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • British Heart Foundation
  • Resuscitation Council
  • NIHR
  • Intensive Care Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, bystander CPR, neighborhood characteristics, population density, occupational status, ethnic minorities, deprivation, high-risk areas, automated external defibrillators, CPR training, England
MeSH terms
Procedures and Techniques Utilization, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, England, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Occupations, Population Density, Residence Characteristics, Rural Population, Socioeconomic Factors, Urban Population, Incidence, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review