The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Women missionaries and colonial silences in Kenya's female ‘circumcision’ controversy, 1906–1930
Open accessAbstract
Abstract For the people of Kenya, recent global debates on the emotional and medical harm caused by female genital mutilation (FGM), allied to arguments about the human rights of the women subjected to such acts, have a significant historical resonance. In the 1920s, Christian missionaries in central Kenya mounted a concerted campaign to prohibit ‘female circumcision’ among their flourishing African congregations. This provoked a backlash, with thousands of Kikuyu Christians deserting the missions to found their own independent churches and schools in the early 1930s. These events, commonly referred to as the ‘female circumcision controversy’, mark a turning point in Kenya’s colonial history. Taking as its starting-point the murder in 1930 of a female missionary with the African Inland Mission, the article explores the actions and attitudes of white women missionaries, revealing a subtle and complex picture of missionary views of African society and the process of Christian conversion, arguing that, as the circumcision crisis developed during 1929, these women stood at the centre of the gathering storm, their experience emblematic of the emotional, cultural and political challenges in the circumcision debate. This account adds an important new dimension to our understanding of gender in Kenya’s circumcision debate, but it also reveals why colonial silence has surrounded the event at the very centre of the crisis: the murder of Hulda Stumpf.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This was evident in colonial Kenya, where the ban on female circumcision triggered significant resistance (Anderson, 2018;Njambi, 2007;Thomas, 2003).”
From Abandoning female genital mutilation/cutting (FGMC) is an emerging but costly parental investment strategy in rural Ethiopia. (2023) · cites this paper as Anderson, 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
womb as oasis: the symbolic context of Pharaonic circumcision in rural Northern Sudan
Boddy, J. (1982) · American Ethnologist · doi:10.1525/ae.1982.9.4.02a00040 · Cited by 213
Politics of the Womb: Women, Reproduction, and the State in Kenya
Schatz, E. J., & Thomas, L. M. (2004) · Labour / Le Travail · doi:10.2307/25149549 · Cited by 187
Civilizing women: British crusades in colonial Sudan
Sharkey, H. J. (2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-5135 · Cited by 103
Jomo Kenyatta, Marie Bonaparte and Bronislaw Malinowski on Clitoridectomy and Female Sexuality
Frederiksen, B. F. (2008) · History Workshop Journal · doi:10.1093/hwj/dbn013 · Cited by 56
Christianity and the Kikuyu: Religious Divisions and Social Conflict
Muriuki, G., & Sandgren, D. P. (1990) · The International Journal of African Historical Studies · doi:10.2307/219361 · Cited by 22
The Kikuyu Problem of the Initiation of Girls.
Leakey, L. S. B. (1931) · The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland · doi:10.2307/2843834 · Cited by 18
The Church Missionary Society and the "Female Circumcision" Issue in Kenya 1929-1932
Murray, J. (1976) · Journal of Religion in Africa · doi:10.2307/1594780 · Cited by 8
Joshua, S. M. (2009) · Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa) · Cited by 6
Juergensmeyer, M., & Roof, W. C. (2012) · Encyclopedia of Global Religion · doi:10.4135/9781412997898.n583 · Cited by 5
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 136 J. Spencer, The Kenya African Union (London, 1985), pp.70-77. 137 Rosberg and Nottingham, Myth of Mau Mau, p. 124. 138 See the correspondence between Nairobi and London, from January to March 1930, in TNA, CO 533/394/10 139 For additional indications of this, see R.D. Waller, 'They Do the Dictating and We Must Submit: The AIM in Maasailand', in T. Spear and I.N. Kimambo, eds., East African Expressions of Christianity (Oxford, 1999), pp. 83-126. 140 Frederiksen, 'Jomo Kenyatta', p. 35. 141 Kanogo, African Womanhood, p. 89.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gibson, M. A., Gurmu, E., Chua, R., Van Bavel, H., & Myers, S. (2023) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116170 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, D. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Anderson, David M
- ORCID
- Anderson, David M
- Venue
- The English Historical Review
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-11-19
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 565
- Pages
- 1512-1545
- ISSN
- 0013-8266 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-4534
- OpenAlex
- W2901028439
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 3.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- The English Historical Review (publishedVersion)
- Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › African history and culture studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Christian Theology and Mission
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues
- Keywords
- female genital mutilation, women missionaries, Christian missions, gender and colonialism, Christian conversion, 1920s
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review