The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Revised ESTS guidelines for preoperative mediastinal lymph node staging for non-small-cell lung cancer
Open accessAbstract
Accurate preoperative staging and restaging of mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with potentially resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is of paramount importance. In 2007, the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) published an algorithm on preoperative mediastinal staging integrating imaging, endoscopic and surgical techniques. In 2009, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) introduced a new lymph node map. Some changes in this map have an important impact on mediastinal staging. Moreover, more evidence of the different mediastinal staging technique has become available. Therefore, a revision of the ESTS guidelines was needed. In case of computed tomography (CT)-enlarged or positron emission tomography (PET)-positive mediastinal lymph nodes, tissue confirmation is indicated. Endosonography [endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS)/esophageal ultrasonography (EUS)] with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is the first choice (when available), since it is minimally invasive and has a high sensitivity to rule in mediastinal nodal disease. If negative, surgical staging with nodal dissection or biopsy is indicated. Video-assisted mediastinoscopy is preferred to mediastinoscopy. The combined use of endoscopic staging and surgical staging results in the highest accuracy. When there are no enlarged lymph nodes on CT and when there is no uptake in lymph nodes on PET or PET-CT, direct surgical resection with systematic nodal dissection is indicated for tumours ≤ 3 cm located in the outer third of the lung. In central tumours or N1 nodes, preoperative mediastinal staging is indicated. The choice between endoscopic staging with EBUS/EUS and FNA or video-assisted mediastinoscopy depends on local expertise to adhere to minimal requirements for staging. For tumours >3 cm, preoperative mediastinal staging is advised, mainly in adenocarcinoma with high standardized uptake value. For restaging, invasive techniques providing histological information are advisable. Both endoscopic techniques and surgical procedures are available, but their negative predictive value is lower compared with the results obtained in baseline staging. An integrated strategy using endoscopic staging techniques to prove mediastinal nodal disease and mediastinoscopy to assess nodal response after induction therapy needs further study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Goldstraw, P., Crowley, J., Chansky, K., Giroux, D. J., Groome, P. A., Rami-Porta, R., Postmus, P. E., Rusch, V., & Sobin, L. (2007) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1097/jto.0b013e31812f3c1a · Cited by 3,655
Self-citation
Cited by
Remon, J., Soria, J.-C., & Peters, S. (2021) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.1994 · Cited by 470
2nd ESMO Consensus Conference in Lung Cancer: locally advanced stage III non-small-cell lung cancer
Eberhardt, W. E. E., De Ruysscher, D., Weder, W., Le Péchoux, C., De Leyn, P., Hoffmann, H., Westeel, V., Stahel, R., Felip, E., Peters, S., et al. (2015) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv187 · Cited by 401
Self-citationMoving the goalposts while scoring―the dilemma posed by new PET technologies
Rogasch, J. M. M., Boellaard, R., Pike, L., Borchmann, P., Johnson, P., Wolf, J., Barrington, S. F., & Kobe, C. (2021) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-021-05403-2 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- De Leyn, P., Dooms, C., Kuzdzal, J., Lardinois, D., Passlick, B., Rami-Porta, R., Turna, A., Schil, P. V., Venuta, F., Waller, D., Weder, W., & Zielinski, M.
- Venue
- European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-02-26
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 787-798
- ISSN
- 1010-7940 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-734X
- OpenAlex
- W2109061552
- Cited by
- 846
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 46.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revised ESTS guidelines for preoperative mediastinal lymph node staging for non-small-cell lung cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ejcts/ezu028
- The paper
- De Leyn, P., Dooms, C., Kuzdzal, J., Lardinois, D., Passlick, B., Rami-Porta, R., Turna, A., Schil, P. V., Venuta, F., Waller, D., Weder, W., & Zielinski, M. (2014). Revised ESTS guidelines for preoperative mediastinal lymph node staging for non-small-cell lung cancer. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezu028
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.