The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
'Core Labour Standards' and the Transformation of the International Labour Rights Regime
Open accessAbstract
The past decade has seeen a transformation of the international labour rights regime based primarily on the adoption of the 1998 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, and the widespread use of the concept of ‘core labour standards’. Notwithstanding the enthusiasm which has greeted these innovations, it is argued that the resulting regime has major potential flaws, including: an excesssive reliance on principles rather than rights, a system which invokes principles that are delinked from the corresponding standards and are thus effectively undefined, an ethos of voluntarism in relation to implementation and enforcement, an unstructured and unaccountable decentralization of responsibility, and a willingness to accept soft ‘promotionalism’ as the bottom line. The regime needs urgent reforms, such as anchoring the principles firmly in the relevant ILO standards, giving greater substance to the Follow-up mechanism, extending monitoring under the Declaration to include an empirical overview of practice under the bilateral and regional mechanisms which have invoked ILO principles and the Declaration itself, and adequately funding the commitment to workers’ rights.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Weiss, M. S. (2002) · Digital Commons at University of Maryland Carey Law (University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law) · Cited by 27
Gender, Work, and the NAFTA Labor Side Agreement
Andrias, K. (2003) · USF Scholarship Repository (University of San Francisco) · Cited by 5
Cited by
Business and Human Rights: The Evolving International Agenda
Ruggie, J. G. (2007) · American Journal of International Law · doi:10.1017/s0002930000037738 · Cited by 283
The Challenge of Child Labour in International Law
Humbert, F. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511641985 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Alston, P.
- Venue
- European Journal of International Law
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-06-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 457-521
- ISSN
- 0938-5428 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3596
- OpenAlex
- W2164943464
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 68.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 'Core Labour Standards' and the Transformation of the International Labour Rights Regime. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ejil/15.3.457
- The paper
- Alston, P. (2004). 'Core Labour Standards' and the Transformation of the International Labour Rights Regime. European Journal of International Law. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/15.3.457
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.