The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global Administrative Law: The Quest for Principles and Values
Open accessAbstract
There is currently much interest in the question whether a global administrative law is coming into being and, if so, whether this is desirable or otherwise. This paper addresses the question of principles for a global administrative law. It considers four potential sources and their suitability as a foundation for a global administrative law system: first, the largely procedural principles that have emerged in national administrative law systems, notably the principle of legality and due process principles (Section 3); second, the set of rule of law values, promoted by proponents of free trade and economic liberalism (Section 4); third, the good governance values, and more particularly transparency, participation and accountability, promoted by the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (Section 5); and finally, human rights values (Section 6). The paper ends on a sceptical note, concluding that a universal set of administrative law principles is difficult to identify and not especially desirable. First, administrative law is primarily a Western construct, protective of Western interests. It may impact unfavourably on developing economies. Secondly, the evolution of global administrative law in adjudicative forums is leading to an undesirable ‘juridification of the political process’. The paper concludes that diversity and pluralism are preferable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
False Dawn: The Delusions of Global Capitalism
Gray, J. H. (1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,023
Sub-Saharan Africa: From Crisis to Sustainable Growth
Brunger, S., & Bank, W. (1990) · African Studies Review · doi:10.2307/524638 · Cited by 524
Can international organizations be democratic? A skeptic's view
Dahl, R. A. (1999) · Democracy's Edges · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511586361.003 · Cited by 498
Formal and substantive conceptions of the rule of law: an analytical framework
Craig, P. (2017) · The Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers · doi:10.4324/9781315085302-4 · Cited by 312
Common Law of Human Rights?: Transnational Judicial Conversations on Constitutional Rights
McCRUDDEN, C. (2000) · Oxford Journal of Legal Studies · doi:10.1093/ojls/20.4.499 · Cited by 243
Miller, J. M. (2003) · The American Journal of Comparative Law · doi:10.2307/3649131 · Cited by 197
What Is a Supranational Constitution? An Essay in International Relations Theory
Stone, A. (1994) · The Review of Politics · doi:10.1017/s003467050001891x · Cited by 147
Cited by
Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes
Black, J. (2008) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2008.00034.x · Cited by 1,215
Good Governance: Concept and Context
Addink, H. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198841159.001.0001 · Cited by 105
What Is Legal Doctrine?: On The Aims and Methods of Legal-Dogmatic Research
Smits, J. M. (2017) · Rethinking Legal Scholarship · doi:10.1017/9781316442906.006 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Harlow, C.
- Venue
- European Journal of International Law
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-02-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 187-214
- ISSN
- 0938-5428 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3596
- OpenAlex
- W1973650593
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 87.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global Administrative Law: The Quest for Principles and Values. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ejil/chi158
- The paper
- Harlow, C. (2006). Global Administrative Law: The Quest for Principles and Values. European Journal of International Law. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chi158
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.