Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,131

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Contemporary Orthodontics (2012)

Open access
McDonald, F.·2013·The European Journal of Orthodontics

Abstract

As has become customary for all of the previous editions, this book represents a valuable teaching resource for all students interested in orthodontics. The previous editions have needed no real introduction, and this edition also adds to the reputation of the authors. It consists of 19 chapters over 724 pages (excluding the index). A major step forward is the availability of the book and images on the internet. This is a major development for which the authors and publishers should be highly commended. HOORAY! But how long has this taken to arrive as a regular feature in dental publishing? However, looking at the subject-matter, the book’s content and format has also clearly been updated with areas of current development, including Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Ligature-less bracket systems, positioner type orthodontic appliances, and a critique of some of the false commercial claims now littering our profession. There is also inclusion of oscillating appliances to speed up tooth movement. As with previous versions, it is quite unique to see an American publication with an implicit realization that literature and data are actually published outside of America. There is a broad representation of articles in the references used. Many dated to 2011 and some ‘In Press’ articles to validate the contemporary opinion in the textbook. A few points immediately stand out for comment (but to say these were major issues would be churlish in the extreme). For example on page 41 the features being depicted are not that obvious; page 75 does not mention Hassall or Lamparski; page 227 has out-of-focus extra-oral features. There could also easily be a physiologist’s debate over the time scale of piezoelectric charge (page 280) and the colour balance of the histology detracts from the quality of the image. These are very very minor points. The logical layout, clear text, and illustrations overwhelm these comments. For example there are some clear and precise flow charts (such as the one on page 416) which assist the reader and it is heartening to see efficient use of removable appliances (page 436) used to distalize and derotate a mesial migrated molar tooth. Any student of orthodontics wishing for self-improvement should acquire the latest text. The reader will not be disappointed. I am also sure the authors will reap their just reputational rewards.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ejo/cjs071

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2,131

Metadata

Authors
McDonald, F.
Venue
The European Journal of Orthodontics
Published
2012-10-01
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
141-141
ISSN
  • 0141-5387 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2210
OpenAlex
W2087770761
Cited by
2,131
References
0
FWCI
165.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contemporary Orthodontics (2012). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ejo/cjs071
The paper
McDonald, F. (2013). Contemporary Orthodontics (2012). The European Journal of Orthodontics. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjs071

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.