Cited by 50EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Attitudes and Success in Children's Learning of English as a Second Language: The Motivational vs. the Resultative Hypothesis

Hermann, G.·1980·ELT Journal

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/elt/34.4.247

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hermann, G.
Corresponding author
Hermann, G.
Venue
ELT Journal
Published
1980-07-01
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
247-254
ISSN
  • 0951-0893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-4526
OpenAlex
W1967759567
Cited by
50
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ELT Journal (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
English as a second language, second language acquisition, student attitudes, academic performance, language learning motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review