Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom: What do the students think?
Abstract
Peer reviews, where students read drafts of their fellow students' essays in order to make suggestions for revision, are common in first-language composition pedagogy. This technique fosters the idea that writing is a process of communicating to an authentic audience. How beneficial are peer reviews for ESL composition students? This article explores the question from the perspectives of forty advanced ESL writing students who were asked about their experiences with peer reviews. Many of the students reported that peer reviews had helped them revise the content of their drafts. However, some students commented that their peers were not able to give useful advice. These students' responses suggest that peer reviews can be helpful to students during the drafting process, but that the task must be carefully structured in order for the students to become successful critics. Suggestions for organizing effective peer review sessions are given.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 164
- Authors
- Mangelsdorf, K.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at El Paso (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mangelsdorf, K.
- Venue
- ELT Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-07-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 274-285
- ISSN
- 0951-0893 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-4526
- OpenAlex
- W4237929620
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 7.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ELT Journal (publishedVersion)
- scholarworks - UTEP (The University of Texas at El Paso) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- peer review, ESL writing, composition instruction, student perceptions, technical drawing, revision, peer feedback, writing process
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
