Native-speaker norms and International English: a classroom view
Abstract
The question of whether students should conform to native‐speaker norms of English, in an era when English is increasingly used in international contexts, is one which has been keenly debated in recent years, not least in the pages of this Journal. However, it is not a debate in which the voices of students and classroom teachers have been heard, and this article attempts to give a classroom perspective on the issue. It is based largely on two parallel questionnaire surveys, which looked at students' and teachers' attitudes to the question of conforming to native‐speaker norms. Taken together, the surveys drew almost 600 responses from students and teachers in over 45 countries. The article argues that students' views may differ from the expectations of teachers and academics, and that it is important for us to be aware of these views.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some research suggests English language learners prefer native-speaker models, meaning Inner Circle speakers, with a preference for British English in particular.
“There is some research among English language learners to suggest that they prefer ' native-speaker ' models (e.g. Timmis, 2002; Carrie & McKenzie, 2018) by which they tend to mean models from ' Inner Circle ' speakers (and a preference for British English in particular).”
From The Global ELT coursebook: A case of Cinderella's slipper? (2022) · cites this paper as Timmis, 2002
Many learners worldwide persistently view English as inherently British, with associated British culture and Britishness.
“There remains among many of its world-wide learners, a surprising but persistent view of the English language as inherently British with the accompanying accoutrements of what is perceived as ' British culture ' and ' Britishness '”
From The Global ELT coursebook: A case of Cinderella's slipper? (2022) · cites this paper as Timmis, 2002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Global ELT coursebook: A case of Cinderella's slipper?
Mishan, F. (2022) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444820000646 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“…the accompanying accoutrements of what is perceived as ‘British culture’ and ‘Britishness’; ‘The language was born in England’ asserted one participant in Timmis’ 2002 study (2002, p. 245) while Marr (2005) quotes a student as stating ‘London […] is the home of the English language […] it is the…”
Background
- Authors
- Timmis, I.
- Corresponding author
- Timmis, I.
- ORCID
- Timmis, I.
- Venue
- ELT Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-07-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 240-249
- ISSN
- 0951-0893 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-4526
- OpenAlex
- W2058935785
- Cited by
- 484
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 34.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ELT Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Social Sciences › Communication › Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
- Keywords
- native speaker norms, international English, English as a second language, student attitudes, teacher attitudes, language standardization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review