Cited by 39EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningLinguistics and Language Analysis

The lexico-grammatical continuum viewed through student error

Salem, I.·2007·ELT Journal

Abstract

As language teachers, we realize that some mistakes found in our students' output are more serious than others. What may be less obvious, though, is that our judgement of learner error can yield linguistic insights, and that sharpening our error-analysis skills might improve the quality of our error feedback. This article presents an error-gravity study, in which written errors made by Hebrew-speaking EFL learners were judged for severity by English teachers in Israel and abroad. The findings show that errors can be viewed as occupying various positions on the lexico-grammatical continuum, and support the claim that lexis and grammar should be considered as interdependent, rather than as two separate entities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/elt/ccm028

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salem, I.
Affiliations
University of Leicester (GB)
Corresponding author
Salem, I.
Venue
ELT Journal
Published
2007-07-01
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
211-219
ISSN
  • 0951-0893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-4526
OpenAlex
W1987604647
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
11.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ELT Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
Keywords
error analysis, error feedback, EFL learners, writing errors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review