The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New Insights into Language Anxiety: Theory, Research and Educational Implications
Abstract
Language anxiety (LA), as one of the key factors in individual differences in second language acquisition (SLA), has been studied for about 40 years. The Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale (FLCAS) in Horwitz, Horwitz and Cope (1986) brought the research to a stage where anxiety in language learning was being explored in specific contexts. With the dynamic turn in SLA (Dörnyei and Ushioda, 2009), LA research has been taking on a new look with the emergence of interdisciplinary theory-guided and multiple methods-driven studies. The volume under review is committed to the mission of clarifying the confusions and misunderstandings about LA in the past, presenting the latest studies, and highlighting theoretical and pedagogical implications for future research. It thus brings together new insights to make yet another beginning in the journey of LA research. This volume opens with an introduction, where the authors present the aims, major themes and the structure of the book. The rest of the book is divided into three parts: (1) theoretical discussions about past and present trends in the development of LA research and interpretations of misreadings of Horwitz’s classical research (Chapters 2 and 3); (2) empirical investigations into LA in light of recent theories, for example, the L2 Motivational Self System (L2MSS, Dörnyei, 2005) (Chapters 4 to 9); and (3) implications for practice, such as designing some activities based on positive psychology to reduce LA (Chapters 10 to 12).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674028845 · Cited by 26,084
Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety
HORWITZ, E. K., HORWITZ, M. B., & COPE, J. (1986) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x · Cited by 5,697
McAdams, D. P., & McLean, K. C. (2013) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721413475622 · Cited by 1,497
Cited by
SECOND LANGUAGE ANXIETY AND ACHIEVEMENT: A META-ANALYSIS
Teimouri, Y., Goetze, J., & Plonsky, L. (2019) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263118000311 · Cited by 611
Greenier, V., Derakhshan, A., & Fathi, J. (2021) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2020.102446 · Cited by 576
How unique is the foreign language classroom enjoyment and anxiety of Chinese EFL learners?
Jiang, Y., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2019) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2019.02.017 · Cited by 517
Does the effect of enjoyment outweigh that of anxiety in foreign language performance?
Dewaele, J.-M., & Alfawzan, M. (2018) · Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.1.2 · Cited by 418
Fathi, J., Rahimi, M., & Derakhshan, A. (2024) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2024.103254 · Cited by 557
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, H.
- Venue
- ELT Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-11-20
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 105-107
- ISSN
- 0951-0893 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-4526
- OpenAlex
- W2901859154
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 71.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Insights into Language Anxiety: Theory, Research and Educational Implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/elt/ccy042
- The paper
- Liu, H. (2019). New Insights into Language Anxiety: Theory, Research and Educational Implications. ELT Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy042
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.