The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Defective mammopoiesis, but normal hematopoiesis, in mice with a targeted disruption of the prolactin gene
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prolactin: structure, function, and regulation of secretion
Freeman, M. E., Kanyicska, B., Lerant, A., & Nagy, G. (2000) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.2000.80.4.1523 · Cited by 2,457
Dopamine as a Prolactin (PRL) Inhibitor
Ben-Jonathan, N., & Hnasko, R. (2001) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.22.6.0451 · Cited by 983
The Role of Placental Hormones in Mediating Maternal Adaptations to Support Pregnancy and Lactation
Napso, T., Yong, H. E. J., Lopez-Tello, J., & Sferruzzi-Perri, A. N. (2018) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2018.01091 · Cited by 470
Neuroendocrine regulation of maternal behavior
Bridges, R. S. (2015) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2014.11.007 · Cited by 346
Hierarchy within the mammary STAT5-driven Wap super-enhancer
Shin, H. Y., Willi, M., Yoo, K. H., Zeng, X., Wang, C., Metser, G., & Hennighausen, L. (2016) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3606 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Horseman, N. D.
- Venue
- The EMBO Journal
- Published
- 1997-12-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 6926-6935
- ISSN
- 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2075
- OpenAlex
- W1977341142
- Cited by
- 650
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defective mammopoiesis, but normal hematopoiesis, in mice with a targeted disruption of the prolactin gene. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/emboj/16.23.6926
- The paper
- Horseman, N. D. (1997). Defective mammopoiesis, but normal hematopoiesis, in mice with a targeted disruption of the prolactin gene. The EMBO Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/16.23.6926
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
