The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prevention of Lower Extremity Stress Fractures in Athletes and Soldiers: A Systematic Review
Abstract
1 National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. 2 Epidemiology Program Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. 3 National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Received for publication July 3, 2002; accepted for publication November 27, 2002. Stress fractures represent one of the most common and potentially serious overuse injuries (1–5). The first cited reports on stress fracture were case studies of soldiers incurring such fractures in the 19th and early 20th centuries (2, 4, 6–9). By the mid-1900s, the condition was being reported in nonmilitary populations with increasing frequency (10–15). Although almost any athlete or exerciser who engages in frequent, repetitive activity may develop a stress fracture (3, 16), repetitive weight-bearing activities such as running and marching are the most frequently reported causes of stress fracture (2, 3, 6, 16, 17). Stress fractures have been reported in most bones of the extremities, as well as the ribs and the spine (3), but the most common location is the lower extremities (2, 3, 16). Among runners, the tibia is the bone most commonly injured (1, 3, 18–20). Early military reports of stress fractures among recruits described march fractures of the foot (7, 21–24). However, during World War II, increasing numbers of military studies described march fractures in other bones of the lower extremities, primarily the tibia (25, 26) and femur (26–28). Recent military papers have shown increasing numbers occurring in the tibia (29–31).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gait retraining to reduce lower extremity loading in runners
Crowell, H. P., & Davis, I. S. (2011) · Clinical Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.09.003 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, B. H.
- Venue
- Epidemiologic Reviews
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-12-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 228-247
- ISSN
- 0193-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1478-6729
- OpenAlex
- W2138510247
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.