The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Causes and Trends of the Digital Divide
Open accessAbstract
In modern societies, the digital divide indicates the emergence of a new form of social inequality. To analyse this concept we study causes of private computer and Internet access with a three-fold model including human capital, family context and social context. The 1997, 2001, and 2003 German Socio-Economic Panel waves contain data on private computer and Internet use, as well as information on past and present socio-economic circumstances. In 2003, membership of technical generations and ethnic background to a large extent determined the use of new technologies. By illustrating the importance of human capital and family context we are able to explain additional differences found for computer and Internet use. Effects of income, gender, and living in a single household are significant. Our study shows that some of the long-term consequences of the 40-year German separation are diminishing with regard to computer use. We demonstrate that human and social capital are more important than economic capital in explaining private computer and Internet use. Indications for higher social classes to secure or even increase their favourable social positions exist.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People's Online Skills
Hargittai, E. (2002) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v7i4.942 · Cited by 1,951 · cited 2×
“level digital divide (Attewell, 2001; DiMaggio and Hargittai, 2001; Hargittai, 2002).”
Background
Cited by
The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors
Friemel, T. N. (2016) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444814538648 · Cited by 1,136
Hao, X., Li, Y., Ren, S., Wu, H., & Hao, Y. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116504 · Cited by 734
Internet use among older Europeans: An analysis based on SHARE data
König, R., Seifert, A., & Doh, M. (2018) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-018-0609-5 · Cited by 363
Does Perceived Ageism Widen the Digital Divide? And Does It Vary by Gender?
Choi, E. Y., Kim, Y., Chipalo, E., & Lee, H. Y. (2020) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnaa066 · Cited by 130
Campos-Castillo, C. (2015) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439314547617 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Korupp, S. E.
- Venue
- European Sociological Review
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-06-06
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 409-422
- ISSN
- 0266-7215 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2672
- OpenAlex
- W2144575636
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 62.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Causes and Trends of the Digital Divide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/esr/jci030
- The paper
- Korupp, S. E. (2005). Causes and Trends of the Digital Divide. European Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jci030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.