Cited by 568Intergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesSocial and Cultural DynamicsSociology and Education Studies

Persistent inequality in educational attainment and its institutional context

Open access
Pfeffer, F. T.·2008·European Sociological Review

Abstract

Research has repeatedly shown that educational opportunities are distributed unevenly in all countries. Therefore, the question is not whether family background and educational outcomes are related but to what degree they are related. This latter question then invites a comparative perspective. That is, does social inequality in education differ across time and countries? If yes, which institutional characteristics can explain differences in educational inequality? Educational inequality is conceptualized as the association between individuals’ and their parents’ highest educational level attained. Intergenerational educational mobility processes are analysed for 20 industrialized nations by means of log-linear and log-multiplicative models. The results show that the degree of educational mobility has remained stable across the second half of the 20th century in virtually all countries. However, nations differ widely in the extent to which parents’ education influences their children's educational attainment. The degree of educational inequality is associated with the institutional structure of national education systems. Rigid systems with dead-end educational pathways appear to be a hindrance to the equalization of educational opportunities, especially if the sorting of students occurs early in the educational career. This association is not mediated by other institutional characteristics included in this analysis that do not exert notable influences on educational mobility…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/esr/jcn026

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pfeffer, F. T.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Pfeffer, F. T.
Venue
European Sociological Review
Published
2008-03-17
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
543-565
ISSN
  • 0266-7215 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2672
OpenAlex
W1985422330
Cited by
568
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 18
FWCI
48.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sociology and Education Studies
Keywords
educational inequality, intergenerational educational mobility, family background, parental education, educational attainment, student sorting, cross-national comparison, developed countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review