Fate and effects of flupyradifurone and sulfoxaflor on non-target soil-dwelling invertebrates
Open accessAbstract
Flupyradifurone and sulfoxaflor are 2 novel insecticides registered for global use. They were developed as alternates to neonicotinoids, and their subsequent use restrictions, based on impacts on non-target organisms. Although structurally distinct, both alternatives share the same mode of action as neonicotinoids, raising concerns about their potential risks to non-target soil invertebrates. The fate and toxicity of flupyradifurone and sulfoxaflor in soil were assessed, tested both as pure chemicals and in commercial formulations (Sivanto™ Prime and Closer™ Insecticide, respectively). The half-life of flupyradifurone in soil ranged from 68 to 75 days for the commercial formulation (Sivanto™ Prime) and extended to 89 days as the pure chemical, reflecting the influence of adjuvants on degradation. In contrast, sulfoxaflor degraded rapidly with a half-life of only 2–3 days in soil for both the pure chemical and Closer™ Insecticide. Toxicity (adult survival and reproduction) was evaluated in 3 soil invertebrate species: Oppia nitens, Eisenia andrei, and Folsomia candida. No toxic effects were observed for O. nitens for all substances tested at the highest concentrations (≥15.5 mg a.i./kg dry soil) after a 28-day exposure. However, E. andrei was the most sensitive species to sulfoxaflor (median lethal concentration [LC50] = 0.25 mg/kg [pure chemical]; median inhibitory concentration [IC50] = 0.11 mg/kg [Closer™ Insecticide] and IC50 = 0.15 mg/kg [pure chemical]), with demonstrated bioaccumulation. Conversely, F. candida was the most sensitive to flupyradifurone, exhibiting significant effects on survival (LC50 < 1.16 mg/kg [pure chemical]) and reproduction (IC50 < 0.28 mg/kg [pure chemical]). Compared to neonicotinoids evaluated previously using the same test conditions, flupyradifurone and sulfoxaflor were less toxic than clothianidin to F. candida. However, sulfoxaflor was more toxic to E. andrei than thiamethoxam, clothianidin, and flupyradifurone.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 1
- Authors
- Hsiung, C., Boyd, P., Lemieux, H., Maisonneuve, F., Scroggins, R., & Princz, J.
- Affiliations
- Environment and Climate Change Canada (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Princz, Juliska
- Venue
- Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2026-03-15
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1494-1507
- ISSN
- 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8618
- OpenAlex
- W7136611758
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 1.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Environment and Climate Change Canada
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
- Keywords
- flupyradifurone, sulfoxaflor, soil invertebrates, non-target toxicity, soil degradation, half-life, adjuvants, Eisenia andrei, Folsomia candida, bioaccumulation, neonicotinoid alternatives, insecticide formulation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Fluorocarbons, Insecticides, Invertebrates, Pyridines, Pyridones, Reproduction, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Sulfur Compounds, 4-Butyrolactone
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review