Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 357

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inflammation in acute myocardial infarction: the good, the bad and the ugly

Open access
Matter, Michael A, Paneni, Francesco, Libby, Peter, Frantz, Stefan, Stähli, Barbara E, Templin, Christian, Mengozzi, Alessandro, Wang, Yu-Jen, Kündig, Thomas M, Räber, Lorenz, Ruschitzka, Frank, Matter, Christian M·2024·European Heart Journal

Abstract

Convergent experimental and clinical evidence have established the pathophysiological importance of pro-inflammatory pathways in coronary artery disease. Notably, the interest in treating inflammation in patients suffering acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is now expanding from its chronic aspects to the acute setting. Few large outcome trials have proven the benefits of anti-inflammatory therapies on cardiovascular outcomes by targeting the residual inflammatory risk (RIR), i.e. the smouldering ember of low-grade inflammation persisting in the late phase after AMI. However, these studies have also taught us about potential risks of anti-inflammatory therapy after AMI, particularly related to impaired host defence. Recently, numerous smaller-scale trials have addressed the concept of targeting a deleterious flare of excessive inflammation in the early phase after AMI. Targeting different pathways and implementing various treatment regimens, those trials have met with varied degrees of success. Promising results have come from those studies intervening early on the interleukin-1 and -6 pathways. Taking lessons from such past research may inform an optimized approach to target post-AMI inflammation, tailored to spare ‘The Good’ (repair and defence) while treating ‘The Bad’ (smouldering RIR) and capturing ‘The Ugly’ (flaming early burst of excess inflammation in the acute phase). Key constituents of such a strategy may read as follows: select patients with large pro-inflammatory burden (i.e. large AMI); initiate treatment early (e.g. ≤12 h post-AMI); implement a precisely targeted anti-inflammatory agent; follow through with a tapering treatment regimen. This approach warrants testing in rigorous clinical trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad486

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 93 references

Cited by

See all 357

Metadata

Authors
Matter, M. A., Paneni, F., Libby, P., Frantz, S., Stähli, B. E., Templin, C., Mengozzi, A., Wang, Y.-J., Kündig, T. M., Räber, L., Ruschitzka, F., & Matter, C. M.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2023-08-17
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
89-103
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W4385898388
Cited by
357
References
93
FWCI
62.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inflammation in acute myocardial infarction: the good, the bad and the ugly. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad486
The paper
Matter, M. A., Paneni, F., Libby, P., Frantz, S., Stähli, B. E., Templin, C., Mengozzi, A., Wang, Y.-J., Kündig, T. M., Räber, L., Ruschitzka, F., & Matter, C. M. (2024). Inflammation in acute myocardial infarction: the good, the bad and the ugly. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad486

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.