The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical and electrocardiographic predictors of a positive response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in advanced heart failure
Open accessAbstract
AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment for refractory congestive heart failure (CHF). However, up to 30% of patients do not respond to CRT. The aim of this study was to identify clinical and electrocardiographic (ECG) predictors of a positive response to CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective study included 139 consecutive patients successfully implanted with a CRT device (mean age, 68+/-9 years, 113 men). At baseline, 69% of patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III, and 31% in class IV, mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 21+/-6%, and mean QRS duration was 188+/-28 ms. In each patient, left and right ventricular leads were placed to attain the shortest QRS duration during biventricular stimulation. Patients were classified at 6 months as responders to CRT (n=100) if they were alive, they had not been re-hospitalized for management of CHF, and the NYHA class had decreased by 1 point, and/or peak VO(2) or 6 min hall-walk increased by >10%. All others were classified as non-responders (n=38; one patient was lost to follow-up). Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to detect a pre- or intra-operative predictor of a positive response to CRT. Among multiple demographic, clinical, and ECG variables, the amount of QRS shortening (DeltaQRS) associated with biventricular stimulation was the only independent predictor of a positive (37+/-23 ms) vs. negative (11+/-23 ms) response to CRT (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: A positive response to CRT was observed in 73% of patients at 6 months and predicted only by DeltaQRS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bristow, M. R., Saxon, L. A., Boehmer, J., Krueger, S., Kass, D. A., De Marco, T., Carson, P., DiCarlo, L., DeMets, D., White, B. G., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa032423 · Cited by 5,812
Cardiac Resynchronization in Chronic Heart Failure
Abraham, W. T., Fisher, W. G., Smith, A. L., Delurgio, D. B., Leon, A. R., Loh, E., Kocovic, D. Z., Packer, M., Clavell, A. L., Hayes, D. L., et al. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa013168 · Cited by 4,648
Cited by
Daubert, J.-C., Saxon, L., Adamson, P. B., Auricchio, A., Berger, R. D., Beshai, J. F., Breithard, O., Brignole, M., Cleland, J., DeLurgio, D. B., et al. (2012) · Heart Rhythm · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.07.025 · Cited by 467
Self-citationIler, M. A., Hu, T., Ayyagari, S., Callahan, T. D., Civello, K. C., Thal, S. G., Wilkoff, B. L., & Chung, M. K. (2008) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.08.043 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Lecoq, G., Leclercq, C., Leray, E., Crocq, C., Alonso, C., Place, C. D., Mabo, P., & Daubert, C.
- Venue
- European Heart Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-02-23
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1094-1100
- ISSN
- 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
- 1522-9645
- OpenAlex
- W2065568623
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical and electrocardiographic predictors of a positive response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in advanced heart failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi146
- The paper
- Lecoq, G., Leclercq, C., Leray, E., Crocq, C., Alonso, C., Place, C. D., Mabo, P., & Daubert, C. (2005). Clinical and electrocardiographic predictors of a positive response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in advanced heart failure. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi146
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.