Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 246

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical and electrocardiographic predictors of a positive response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in advanced heart failure

Open access
Lecoq, Guillaume, Leclercq, Christophe, Leray, Emmanuelle, Crocq, Christophe, Alonso, Christine, Place, Christian de, Mabo, Philippe, Daubert, Claude·2005·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment for refractory congestive heart failure (CHF). However, up to 30% of patients do not respond to CRT. The aim of this study was to identify clinical and electrocardiographic (ECG) predictors of a positive response to CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective study included 139 consecutive patients successfully implanted with a CRT device (mean age, 68+/-9 years, 113 men). At baseline, 69% of patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III, and 31% in class IV, mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 21+/-6%, and mean QRS duration was 188+/-28 ms. In each patient, left and right ventricular leads were placed to attain the shortest QRS duration during biventricular stimulation. Patients were classified at 6 months as responders to CRT (n=100) if they were alive, they had not been re-hospitalized for management of CHF, and the NYHA class had decreased by 1 point, and/or peak VO(2) or 6 min hall-walk increased by >10%. All others were classified as non-responders (n=38; one patient was lost to follow-up). Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to detect a pre- or intra-operative predictor of a positive response to CRT. Among multiple demographic, clinical, and ECG variables, the amount of QRS shortening (DeltaQRS) associated with biventricular stimulation was the only independent predictor of a positive (37+/-23 ms) vs. negative (11+/-23 ms) response to CRT (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: A positive response to CRT was observed in 73% of patients at 6 months and predicted only by DeltaQRS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi146

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 246

Metadata

Authors
Lecoq, G., Leclercq, C., Leray, E., Crocq, C., Alonso, C., Place, C. D., Mabo, P., & Daubert, C.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2005-02-23
Volume
26
Issue
11
Pages
1094-1100
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2065568623
Cited by
246
References
2
FWCI
12.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical and electrocardiographic predictors of a positive response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in advanced heart failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi146
The paper
Lecoq, G., Leclercq, C., Leray, E., Crocq, C., Alonso, C., Place, C. D., Mabo, P., & Daubert, C. (2005). Clinical and electrocardiographic predictors of a positive response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in advanced heart failure. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi146

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.