Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 178

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Incidence of recognized and unrecognized myocardial infarction in men and women aged 55 and older: the Rotterdam Study

de Torbal, Anneke, Boersma, Eric, Kors, Jan A., van Herpen, Gerard, Deckers, Jaap W., van der Kuip, Deirdre A.M., Stricker, Bruno H., Hofman, Albert, Witteman, Jacqueline C.M.·2006·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: Contemporary data on the incidence of unrecognized myocardial infarction (MI) among subjects aged 55 and older are limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied the incidence of recognized and unrecognized MI in the Rotterdam Study, a population-based cohort of men and women aged 55 and older. The baseline examination was performed during 1990-93, with follow-up examinations during 1994-95, and 1997-2000. Baseline and follow-up 12-lead ECGs were analysed by the Modular ECG Analysis System. The 5148 participants who had no evidence of prevalent infarction were the subjects for analysis. Incident recognized infarction was defined as the occurrence of a fatal or non-fatal event coded as I21 according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition. A repeat ECG was available in 4187 subjects. An unrecognized infarction was considered to have occurred if there was electrocardiographic evidence in the absence of a clinically recognized event. During a median follow-up of 6.4 years, 141 incident recognized infarctions occurred and the incidence rate of this event was 5.0 per 1000 person years. The incidence was higher in men (8.4) than in women (3.1). The incidence rate of unrecognized infarction was 3.8 per 1000 person years. Men (4.2) and women (3.6) had approximately similar incidence. Hence, the proportion of unrecognized infarction was lower in men (33%) than in women (54%). This difference in proportion of unrecognized infarctions was independent of age. CONCLUSION: A high proportion of incident MIs remains clinically unrecognized. As a history of MI is associated with an increased risk of repeat cardiovascular complications, our data suggest a need for periodical electrocardiographic screening to recognize (prevalent) infarctions and to install effective preventive treatment in those aged 55 and older.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi707

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 178

Metadata

Authors
de Torbal, A., Boersma, E., Kors, J. A., van Herpen, G., Deckers, J. W., van der Kuip, D. A. M., Stricker, B. H., Hofman, A., & Witteman, J. C. M.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2006-02-14
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
729-736
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2117419890
Cited by
178
References
3
FWCI
9.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence of recognized and unrecognized myocardial infarction in men and women aged 55 and older: the Rotterdam Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi707
The paper
de Torbal, A., Boersma, E., Kors, J. A., van Herpen, G., Deckers, J. W., van der Kuip, D. A. M., Stricker, B. H., Hofman, A., & Witteman, J. C. M. (2006). Incidence of recognized and unrecognized myocardial infarction in men and women aged 55 and older: the Rotterdam Study. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi707

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.