Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 272

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Thrombolysis during cardiopulmonary resuscitation should be addressed in guidelines for pulmonary embolism: reply

Torbicki, A., Perrier, A., Konstantinides, S.·2008·European Heart Journal

Abstract

Dr Koracevic raised an interesting point, suggesting that thrombolysis should be recommended in patients with PE who present with cardiac arrest. Indeed, if caused by PE, cardiac arrest is indicating the highest risk of early death. And resuscitation is no longer considered an important contraindication to thrombolytic treatment.1 The problem is in diagnosing PE in the setting of cardiac arrest. Thrombolytic treatment was suggested to increase the chances of survival in unselected patients with cardiac arrest. However, encouraging preliminary reports and a metaanalysis of eight trials including 926 patients2 were not confirmed by a large multicentre study. In fact, the TROICA trial was discontinued in April 2006 after enrolling over 1000 patients because the preliminary data analysis indicated that it would be unlikely to demonstrate the superiority of tenecteplase over placebo during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.3 Importantly, the study was not stopped due to safety issues; the intracranial haemorrhage rate was within the expected range for fibrinolytic treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn475

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Keuper, 2007, Resuscitation, 73, 189, 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.08.030 · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.08.030
  2. Li, 2006, Resuscitation, 70, 31, 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.11.016 · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.11.016
  3. Stadlbauer, 2006, The American journal of cardiology, 97, 305, 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.08.045 · doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.08.045
  4. 2008, Current opinion in critical care, 14, 292, 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282fb2ddf · doi:10.1097/mcc.0b013e3282fb2ddf
  5. Abu-Laban, 2002, New England Journal of Medicine, 346, 1522, 10.1056/NEJMoa012885 · doi:10.1056/nejmoa012885
  6. van der Wouw, 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 30, 780, 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00218-0 · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00218-0

Cited by

See all 272

Metadata

Authors
Torbicki, A., Perrier, A., & Konstantinides, S.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2008-10-24
Volume
29
Issue
24
Pages
3067-3068
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W4251433429
Cited by
272
References
0
FWCI
29.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thrombolysis during cardiopulmonary resuscitation should be addressed in guidelines for pulmonary embolism: reply. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/ehn475
The paper
Torbicki, A., Perrier, A., & Konstantinides, S. (2008). Thrombolysis during cardiopulmonary resuscitation should be addressed in guidelines for pulmonary embolism: reply. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehn475

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.