Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 284

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Contemporary management of octogenarians hospitalized for heart failure in Europe: Euro Heart Failure Survey II

Open access
Komajda, M., Hanon, O., Hochadel, M., Lopez-Sendon, J. L., Follath, F., Ponikowski, P., Harjola, V.-P., Drexler, H., Dickstein, K., Tavazzi, L., Nieminen, M.·2008·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: International guidelines are frequently not implemented in the elderly population with heart failure (HF). This study determined the management of octogenarians with HF enrolled in Euro Heart Failure Survey II (EHFS II) (2004-05). METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the clinical profile, 12 month outcomes, and management modalities between 741 octogenarians (median age 83.7 years) and 2836 younger patients (median age 68.4 years) hospitalized for acute/decompensated HF. Management modalities were also compared with those observed in EHFS I (2000-01). Female gender, new onset HF (de novo), hypertension, atrial fibrillation, co-morbidities, disabilities, and low quality of life were more common in the elderly (all P < 0.001). Mortality rates during hospital stay and during 12 months after discharge were increased in octogenarians (10.7 vs. 5.6% and 28.4 vs. 18.5%, P < 0.001). Underuse and underdosage of medications recommended for HF were observed in the elderly. However, a significant improvement was observed when compared with EHFS I both in the overall HF octogenarian population and in the subgroup with ejection fraction < or =45% for prescription rates of ACE-I/ARBs, beta-blockers, and aldosterone antagonists at discharge (82 vs. 71%; 56 vs. 29%; 54 vs. 18.5%, respectively, all P < 0.01), as well as for recommended combinations and dosage. Prescription rates remained stable for 12 months after discharge in survivors. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that the contemporary management of very elderly patients with HF remains suboptimal but that the situation is improving.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn539

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. -1, European Journal of Heart Failure, -1, MASTER, 10.1016/S1567-4215(05)80247-4 · doi:10.1016/s1567-4215(05)80247-4
  2. 1999, JAMA, 12, 1714
  3. Ahmed, 2002, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 50, 1831, 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50512.x · doi:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50512.x

Cited by

See all 284

Metadata

Authors
Komajda, M., Hanon, O., Hochadel, M., Lopez-Sendon, J. L., Follath, F., Ponikowski, P., Harjola, V.-P., Drexler, H., Dickstein, K., Tavazzi, L., & Nieminen, M.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2008-09-27
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
478-486
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2154814586
Cited by
284
References
45
FWCI
9.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contemporary management of octogenarians hospitalized for heart failure in Europe: Euro Heart Failure Survey II. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/ehn539
The paper
Komajda, M., Hanon, O., Hochadel, M., Lopez-Sendon, J. L., Follath, F., Ponikowski, P., Harjola, V.-P., Drexler, H., Dickstein, K., Tavazzi, L., & Nieminen, M. (2008). Contemporary management of octogenarians hospitalized for heart failure in Europe: Euro Heart Failure Survey II. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehn539

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.