The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intracoronary bone marrow cell transfer after myocardial infarction: 5-year follow-up from the randomized-controlled BOOST trial
Abstract
AIMS: We assessed whether a single intracoronary infusion of autologous bone marrow cells (BMCs) can have a sustained impact on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In the BOne marrOw transfer to enhance ST-elevation infarct regeneration (BOOST) trial, 60 patients with STEMI and successful percutaneous coronary intervention were randomized to a control and a cell therapy group. As previously reported, BMC transfer led to an improvement of LVEF by 6.0% at 6 months (P = 0.003) and 2.8% at 18 months (P = 0.27). METHODS AND RESULTS: Left ventricular ejection fraction and clinical status were re-assessed in all surviving patients after 61 +/- 11 months. Major adverse cardiac events occurred with similar frequency in both groups. When compared with baseline, LVEF assessed by magnetic resonance imaging at 61 months decreased by 3.3 +/- 9.5% in the control group and by 2.5 +/- 11.9% in the BMC group (P = 0.30). Patients with an infarct transmurality > median appeared to benefit from BMC transfer throughout the 61-month study period (P = 0.040). CONCLUSION: A single intracoronary application of BMCs does not promote a sustained improvement of LVEF in STEMI patients with relatively preserved systolic function. It is conceivable that a subgroup of patients with more transmural infarcts may derive a sustained benefit from BMC therapy. However, this needs to be tested prospectively in a randomized trial.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Li, T.-S., Cheng, K., Malliaras, K., Smith, R. R., Zhang, Y., Sun, B., Matsushita, N., Blusztajn, A., Terrovitis, J., Kusuoka, H., et al. (2012) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.029 · Cited by 461
Cell therapy for cardiac repair—lessons from clinical trials
Behfar, A., Crespo-Diaz, R., Terzic, A., & Gersh, B. J. (2014) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2014.9 · Cited by 292
Han, J., Kim, Y. S., Lim, M.-Y., Kim, H. Y., Kong, S., Kang, M., Choo, Y. W., Jun, J. H., Ryu, S., Jeong, H.-Y., et al. (2018) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b09107 · Cited by 258
Genetic Engineering of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Its Application in Human Disease Therapy
Hodgkinson, C. P., Gomez, J. A., Mirotsou, M., & Dzau, V. J. (2010) · Human Gene Therapy · doi:10.1089/hum.2010.165 · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Meyer, G. P., Wollert, K. C., Lotz, J., Pirr, J., Rager, U., Lippolt, P., Hahn, A., Fichtner, S., Schaefer, A., Arseniev, L., Ganser, A., & Drexler, H.
- Venue
- European Heart Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-09-22
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 2978-2984
- ISSN
- 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
- 1522-9645
- OpenAlex
- W2096493223
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intracoronary bone marrow cell transfer after myocardial infarction: 5-year follow-up from the randomized-controlled BOOST trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp374
- The paper
- Meyer, G. P., Wollert, K. C., Lotz, J., Pirr, J., Rager, U., Lippolt, P., Hahn, A., Fichtner, S., Schaefer, A., Arseniev, L., Ganser, A., & Drexler, H. (2009). Intracoronary bone marrow cell transfer after myocardial infarction: 5-year follow-up from the randomized-controlled BOOST trial. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp374
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.