Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 657

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reperfusion therapy for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction in Europe: description of the current situation in 30 countries

Open access
Widimsky, P., Wijns, W., Fajadet, J., de Belder, M., Knot, J., Aaberge, L., Andrikopoulos, G., Baz, J. A., Betriu, A., Claeys, M., Danchin, N., Djambazov, S., Erne, P., Hartikainen, J., Huber, K., Kala, P., Klinceva, M., Kristensen, S. D., Ludman, P., Ferre, J. M., Merkely, B., Milicic, D., Morais, J., Noc, M., Opolski, G., Ostojic, M., Radovanovic, D., De Servi, S., Stenestrand, U., Studencan, M., Tubaro, M., Vasiljevic, Z., Weidinger, F., Witkowski, A., Zeymer, U., on behalf of the European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions·2010·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: Patient access to reperfusion therapy and the use of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI) or thrombolysis (TL) varies considerably between European countries. The aim of this study was to obtain a realistic contemporary picture of how patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are treated in different European countries. METHODS AND RESULTS: The chairpersons of the national working groups/societies of interventional cardiology in European countries and selected experts known to be involved in the national registries joined the writing group upon invitation. Data were collected about the country and any existing national STEMI or PCI registries, about STEMI epidemiology, and treatment in each given country and about PCI and p-PCI centres and procedures in each country. Results from the national and/or regional registries in 30 countries were included in this analysis. The annual incidence of hospital admission for any acute myocardial infarction (AMI) varied between 90-312/100 thousand/year, the incidence of STEMI alone ranging from 44 to 142. Primary PCI was the dominant reperfusion strategy in 16 countries and TL in 8 countries. The use of a p-PCI strategy varied between 5 and 92% (of all STEMI patients) and the use of TL between 0 and 55%. Any reperfusion treatment (p-PCI or TL) was used in 37-93% of STEMI patients. Significantly less reperfusion therapy was used in those countries where TL was the dominant strategy. The number of p-PCI procedures per million per year varied among countries between 20 and 970. The mean population served by a single p-PCI centre varied between 0.3 and 7.4 million inhabitants. In those countries offering p-PCI services to the majority of their STEMI patients, this population varied between 0.3 and 1.1 million per centre. In-hospital mortality of all consecutive STEMI patients varied between 4.2 and 13.5%, for patients treated by TL between 3.5 and 14% and for patients treated by p-PCI between 2.7 and 8%. The time reported from symptom onset to the first medical contact (FMC) varied between 60 and 210 min, FMC-needle time for TL between 30 and 110 min, and FMC-balloon time for p-PCI between 60 and 177 min. CONCLUSION: Most North, West, and Central European countries used p-PCI for the majority of their STEMI patients. The lack of organized p-PCI networks was associated with fewer patients overall receiving some form of reperfusion therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp492

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 657

Metadata

Authors
Widimsky, P., Wijns, W., Fajadet, J., de Belder, M., Knot, J., Aaberge, L., Andrikopoulos, G., Baz, J. A., Betriu, A., Claeys, M., Danchin, N., Djambazov, S., Erne, P., Hartikainen, J., Huber, K., Kala, P., Klinceva, M., Kristensen, S. D., Ludman, P., Ferre, J. M., Merkely, B., Milicic, D., Morais, J., Noc, M., Opolski, G., Ostojic, M., Radovanovic, D., De Servi, S., Stenestrand, U., Studencan, M., Tubaro, M., Vasiljevic, Z., Weidinger, F., Witkowski, A., Zeymer, U., & on behalf of the European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2009-11-19
Volume
31
Issue
8
Pages
943-957
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2155638956
Cited by
657
References
27
FWCI
32.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reperfusion therapy for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction in Europe: description of the current situation in 30 countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp492
The paper
Widimsky, P., Wijns, W., Fajadet, J., de Belder, M., Knot, J., Aaberge, L., Andrikopoulos, G., Baz, J. A., Betriu, A., Claeys, M., Danchin, N., Djambazov, S., Erne, P., Hartikainen, J., Huber, K., Kala, P., Klinceva, M., Kristensen, S. D., Ludman, P., . . . on behalf of the European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. (2010). Reperfusion therapy for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction in Europe: description of the current situation in 30 countries. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp492

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.