The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Compliance with non-pharmacological recommendations and outcome in heart failure patients
Abstract
AIMS: The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the association between compliance with non-pharmacological recommendations (diet, fluid restriction, weighing, exercise) and outcome in patients with heart failure (HF). METHODS AND RESULTS: In total 830 patients after an HF hospitalization participated in the study (age 70 +/- 11; left ventricular ejection fraction 34%). Compliance was measured 1 month after discharge; patients were followed for 18 months. Primary outcomes were the composite of death or HF readmission and the number of unfavourable days. Cox regression analysis was used to determine the association between primary outcome and compliance. Adjustments were made for those variables that were identified as confounders in the association between compliance and outcome. Patients who were non-compliant with at least one of the recommendations had a higher risk of mortality or HF readmission (HR 1.40; P = 0.01). Non-compliance with exercise was associated with an increased risk for mortality or HF readmission (HR 1.48; P < 0.01), while non-compliance with daily weighing was associated with an increased risk of mortality (HR 1.57; P = 0.02). Non-compliance (overall) and non-compliance with exercise were both associated with a higher risk for HF readmission [HR 1.38; P < 0.05(overall) and HR 1.55; P < 0.01(exercise)]. Patients who were overall non-compliant or with weighing and exercise had more unfavourable days than compliant patients. CONCLUSION: Non-compliance with non-pharmacological recommendations in HF patients is associated with adverse outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure
Yancy, C. W., Jessup, M., Bozkurt, B., Butler, J., Casey, D. E., Drazner, M. H., Fonarow, G. C., Geraci, S. A., Horwich, T., Januzzi, J. L., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.019 · Cited by 12,536
Yancy, C. W., Jessup, M., Bozkurt, B., Butler, J., Casey, D. E., Drazner, M. H., Fonarow, G. C., Geraci, S. A., Horwich, T., Januzzi, J. L., et al. (2013) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e31829e8776 · Cited by 2,106
Lainscak, M., Blue, L., Clark, A. L., Dahlström, U., Dickstein, K., Ekman, I., McDonagh, T., McMurray, J. J., Ryder, M., Stewart, S., et al. (2011) · European Journal of Heart Failure · doi:10.1093/eurjhf/hfq219 · Cited by 405
Self-citationRole of self-care in the patient with heart failure
Moser, D. K., Dickson, V., Jaarsma, T., Lee, C., Stromberg, A., & Riegel, B. (2012) · Current Cardiology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11886-012-0267-9 · Cited by 186
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Wal, M. H. L., van Veldhuisen, D. J., Veeger, N. J. G. M., Rutten, F. H., & Jaarsma, T.
- Venue
- European Heart Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-04-30
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1486-1493
- ISSN
- 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
- 1522-9645
- OpenAlex
- W2129634336
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Compliance with non-pharmacological recommendations and outcome in heart failure patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq091
- The paper
- van der Wal, M. H. L., van Veldhuisen, D. J., Veeger, N. J. G. M., Rutten, F. H., & Jaarsma, T. (2010). Compliance with non-pharmacological recommendations and outcome in heart failure patients. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq091
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.