Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 706

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predictors of pregnancy complications in women with congenital heart disease

Open access
Drenthen, Willem, Boersma, Eric, Balci, Ali, Moons, Philip, Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W., Mulder, Barbara J.M., Vliegen, Hubert W., van Dijk, Arie P.J., Voors, Adriaan A., Yap, Sing C., van Veldhuisen, Dirk J., Pieper, Petronella G., On behalf of the ZAHARA Investigators·2010·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: Data regarding pregnancy outcome in women with congenital heart disease (CHD) are limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 1802 women with CHD, 1302 completed pregnancies were observed. Independent predictors of cardiac, obstetric, and neonatal complications were calculated using logistic regression. The most prevalent cardiac complications during pregnancy were arrhythmias (4.7%) and heart failure (1.6%). Factors independently associated with maternal cardiac complications were the presence of cyanotic heart disease (corrected/uncorrected) (P < 0.0001), the use of cardiac medication before pregnancy (P < 0.0001), and left heart obstruction (P < 0.0001). New characteristics were mechanical valve replacement (P = 0.0014), and systemic (P = 0.04) or pulmonary atrioventricular valve regurgitation related with the underlying (moderately) complex CHD (P = 0.03). A new risk score for cardiac complications is proposed. The most prevalent obstetric complications were hypertensive complications (12.2%). No correlation of maternal characteristics with adverse obstetric outcome was found. The most prevalent neonatal complications were premature birth (12%), small for gestational age (14%), and mortality (4%). Cyanotic heart disease (corrected/uncorrected) (P = 0.0003), mechanical valve replacement (P = 0.03), maternal smoking (P = 0.007), multiple gestation (P = 0.0014), and the use of cardiac medication (P = 0.0009) correlated with adverse neonatal outcome. CONCLUSION: In our tertiary CHD cohort, cardiac, obstetric, and neonatal complications were frequently encountered, and (new) correlations of maternal baseline data with adverse outcome are reported. A new risk score for adverse cardiac complications is proposed, although prospective validation remains necessary.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq200

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 706

Metadata

Authors
Drenthen, W., Boersma, E., Balci, A., Moons, P., Roos-Hesselink, J. W., Mulder, B. J. M., Vliegen, H. W., van Dijk, A. P. J., Voors, A. A., Yap, S. C., van Veldhuisen, D. J., Pieper, P. G., & On behalf of the ZAHARA Investigators
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2010-06-28
Volume
31
Issue
17
Pages
2124-2132
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2114670102
Cited by
706
References
1
FWCI
13.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictors of pregnancy complications in women with congenital heart disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq200
The paper
Drenthen, W., Boersma, E., Balci, A., Moons, P., Roos-Hesselink, J. W., Mulder, B. J. M., Vliegen, H. W., van Dijk, A. P. J., Voors, A. A., Yap, S. C., van Veldhuisen, D. J., Pieper, P. G., & On behalf of the ZAHARA Investigators. (2010). Predictors of pregnancy complications in women with congenital heart disease. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq200

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.