Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 230

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical implications of new-onset left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: analysis of the PARTNER experience

Open access
Nazif, Tamim M., Williams, Mathew R., Hahn, Rebecca T., Kapadia, Samir, Babaliaros, Vasilis, Rodés-Cabau, Josep, Szeto, Wilson Y., Jilaihawi, Hasan, Fearon, William F., Dvir, Danny, Dewey, Todd M., Makkar, Raj R., Xu, Ke, Dizon, Jose M., Smith, Craig R., Leon, Martin B., Kodali, Susheel K.·2014·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: Cardiac conduction disturbances, including a left bundle branch block (LBBB), occur frequently following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and may be associated with adverse clinical events. This analysis examines the incidence and implications of new onset, persistent LBBB in patients undergoing TAVR with a balloon-expandable valve. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing TAVR in the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial and continued access registries with baseline and discharge/7-day electrocardiograms were included. Prior permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) and baseline intraventricular conduction abnormalities were exclusion criteria. Predictors of new LBBB were identified and outcomes compared between patients with and without new LBBB. New LBBB occurred in 121 of 1151 (10.5%) patients and persisted in more than half at 6 months to 1 year. The only predictor of new LBBB was prior coronary artery bypass grafting. New LBBB was not associated with significant differences in 1-year mortality, cardiovascular mortality, repeat hospitalization, stroke, or myocardial infarction. However, it was associated with increased PPI during hospitalization (8.3 vs 2.8%, P = 0.005) and from discharge to 1 year (4.7 vs. 1.5%, P = 0.01). The ejection fraction failed to improve after TAVR in patients with new LBBB and remained lower at 6 months to 1 year (52.8 vs. 58.1%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Persistent, new-onset LBBB occurred in 10.5% of patients without intraventricular baseline conduction who underwent TAVR in the PARTNER experience. New LBBB was not associated with death, repeat hospitalization, stroke, or myocardial infarction at 1 year, but was associated with a higher rate of PPI and failure of left ventricular ejection fraction to improve.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/eht376

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 230

Metadata

Authors
Nazif, T. M., Williams, M. R., Hahn, R. T., Kapadia, S., Babaliaros, V., Rodés-Cabau, J., Szeto, W. Y., Jilaihawi, H., Fearon, W. F., Dvir, D., Dewey, T. M., Makkar, R. R., Xu, K., Dizon, J. M., Smith, C. R., Leon, M. B., & Kodali, S. K.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2013-10-30
Volume
35
Issue
24
Pages
1599-1607
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2149277991
Cited by
230
References
3
FWCI
11.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical implications of new-onset left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: analysis of the PARTNER experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/eht376
The paper
Nazif, T. M., Williams, M. R., Hahn, R. T., Kapadia, S., Babaliaros, V., Rodés-Cabau, J., Szeto, W. Y., Jilaihawi, H., Fearon, W. F., Dvir, D., Dewey, T. M., Makkar, R. R., Xu, K., Dizon, J. M., Smith, C. R., Leon, M. B., & Kodali, S. K. (2014). Clinical implications of new-onset left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: analysis of the PARTNER experience. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht376

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.