The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
T1 mapping and survival in systemic light-chain amyloidosis
Open accessAbstract
AIMS: To assess the prognostic value of myocardial pre-contrast T1 and extracellular volume (ECV) in systemic amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) T1 mapping. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred patients underwent CMR and T1 mapping pre- and post-contrast. Myocardial ECV was calculated at contrast equilibrium (ECV(i)) and 15 min post-bolus (ECVb). Fifty-four healthy volunteers served as controls. Patients were followed up for a median duration of 23 months and survival analyses were performed. Mean ECV(i) was raised in amyloid (0.44 ± 0.12) as was ECV(b) (mean 0.44 ± 0.12) compared with healthy volunteers (0.25 ± 0.02), P < 0.001. Native pre-contrast T1 was raised in amyloid (mean 1080 ± 87 ms vs. 954 ± 34 ms, P < 0.001). All three correlated with pre-test probability of cardiac involvement, cardiac biomarkers, and systolic and diastolic dysfunction. During follow-up, 25 deaths occurred. An ECV(i) of >0.45 carried a hazard ratio (HR) for death of 3.84 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.53-9.61], P = 0.004 and pre-contrast T1 of >1044 ms = HR 5.39 (95% CI: 1.24-23.4), P = 0.02. Extracellular volume after primed infusion and ECVb performed similarly. Isolated post-contrast T1 was non-predictive. In Cox regression models, ECV(i) was independently predictive of mortality (HR = 4.41, 95% CI: 1.35-14.4) after adjusting for E:E', ejection fraction, diastolic dysfunction grade, and NT-proBNP. CONCLUSION: Myocardial ECV (bolus or infusion technique) and pre-contrast T1 are biomarkers for cardiac AL amyloid and they predict mortality in systemic amyloidosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzalez, N., & Conde, J. G. (2009) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 · Cited by 51,384
Relaxing the Rule of Ten Events per Variable in Logistic and Cox Regression
Vittinghoff, E., & McCulloch, C. E. (2007) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwk052 · Cited by 4,359
Cited by
AL (Light-Chain) Cardiac Amyloidosis
Falk, R. H., Alexander, K. M., Liao, R., & Dorbala, S. (2016) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.053 · Cited by 649
Seferović, P. M., Polovina, M., Bauersachs, J., Arad, M., Ben Gal, T., Lund, L. H., Felix, S. B., Arbustini, E., Caforio, A. L. P., Farmakis, D., et al. (2019) · European Journal of Heart Failure · doi:10.1002/ejhf.1461 · Cited by 346
How to Image Cardiac Amyloidosis
Dorbala, S., Cuddy, S., & Falk, R. H. (2020) · JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.07.015 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Banypersad, S. M., Fontana, M., Maestrini, V., Sado, D. M., Captur, G., Petrie, A., Piechnik, S. K., Whelan, C. J., Herrey, A. S., Gillmore, J. D., Lachmann, H. J., Wechalekar, A. D., Hawkins, P. N., & Moon, J. C.
- Venue
- European Heart Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-11-16
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 244-251
- ISSN
- 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
- 1522-9645
- OpenAlex
- W2114581617
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: T1 mapping and survival in systemic light-chain amyloidosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu444
- The paper
- Banypersad, S. M., Fontana, M., Maestrini, V., Sado, D. M., Captur, G., Petrie, A., Piechnik, S. K., Whelan, C. J., Herrey, A. S., Gillmore, J. D., Lachmann, H. J., Wechalekar, A. D., Hawkins, P. N., & Moon, J. C. (2015). T1 mapping and survival in systemic light-chain amyloidosis. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu444
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.