Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 393

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

T1 mapping and survival in systemic light-chain amyloidosis

Open access
Banypersad, S. M., Fontana, M., Maestrini, V., Sado, D. M., Captur, G., Petrie, A., Piechnik, S. K., Whelan, C. J., Herrey, A. S., Gillmore, J. D., Lachmann, H. J., Wechalekar, A. D., Hawkins, P. N., Moon, J. C.·2015·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: To assess the prognostic value of myocardial pre-contrast T1 and extracellular volume (ECV) in systemic amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) T1 mapping. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred patients underwent CMR and T1 mapping pre- and post-contrast. Myocardial ECV was calculated at contrast equilibrium (ECV(i)) and 15 min post-bolus (ECVb). Fifty-four healthy volunteers served as controls. Patients were followed up for a median duration of 23 months and survival analyses were performed. Mean ECV(i) was raised in amyloid (0.44 ± 0.12) as was ECV(b) (mean 0.44 ± 0.12) compared with healthy volunteers (0.25 ± 0.02), P < 0.001. Native pre-contrast T1 was raised in amyloid (mean 1080 ± 87 ms vs. 954 ± 34 ms, P < 0.001). All three correlated with pre-test probability of cardiac involvement, cardiac biomarkers, and systolic and diastolic dysfunction. During follow-up, 25 deaths occurred. An ECV(i) of >0.45 carried a hazard ratio (HR) for death of 3.84 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.53-9.61], P = 0.004 and pre-contrast T1 of >1044 ms = HR 5.39 (95% CI: 1.24-23.4), P = 0.02. Extracellular volume after primed infusion and ECVb performed similarly. Isolated post-contrast T1 was non-predictive. In Cox regression models, ECV(i) was independently predictive of mortality (HR = 4.41, 95% CI: 1.35-14.4) after adjusting for E:E', ejection fraction, diastolic dysfunction grade, and NT-proBNP. CONCLUSION: Myocardial ECV (bolus or infusion technique) and pre-contrast T1 are biomarkers for cardiac AL amyloid and they predict mortality in systemic amyloidosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu444

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 393

Metadata

Authors
Banypersad, S. M., Fontana, M., Maestrini, V., Sado, D. M., Captur, G., Petrie, A., Piechnik, S. K., Whelan, C. J., Herrey, A. S., Gillmore, J. D., Lachmann, H. J., Wechalekar, A. D., Hawkins, P. N., & Moon, J. C.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2014-11-16
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
244-251
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2114581617
Cited by
393
References
2
FWCI
13.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: T1 mapping and survival in systemic light-chain amyloidosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu444
The paper
Banypersad, S. M., Fontana, M., Maestrini, V., Sado, D. M., Captur, G., Petrie, A., Piechnik, S. K., Whelan, C. J., Herrey, A. S., Gillmore, J. D., Lachmann, H. J., Wechalekar, A. D., Hawkins, P. N., & Moon, J. C. (2015). T1 mapping and survival in systemic light-chain amyloidosis. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu444

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.