Exercise and the heart: the good, the bad, and the ugly
Abstract
The benefits of exercise are irrefutable. Individuals engaging in regular exercise have a favourable cardiovascular risk profile for coronary artery disease and reduce their risk of myocardial infarction by 50%. Exercise promotes longevity of life, reduces the risk of some malignancies, retards the onset of dementia, and is as considered an antidepressant. Most of these benefits are attributable to moderate exercise, whereas athletes perform way beyond the recommended levels of physical activity and constantly push back the frontiers of human endurance. The cardiovascular adaptation for generating a large and sustained increase in cardiac output during prolonged exercise includes a 10-20% increase in cardiac dimensions. In rare instances, these physiological increases in cardiac size overlap with morphologically mild expressions of the primary cardiomyopathies and resolving the diagnostic dilemma can be challenging. Intense exercise may infrequently trigger arrhythmogenic sudden cardiac death in an athlete harbouring asymptomatic cardiac disease. In parallel with the extraordinary athletic milieu of physical performances previously considered unachievable, there is emerging data indicating that long-standing vigorous exercise may be associated with adverse electrical and structural remodelling in otherwise normal hearts. Finally, in the current era of celebrity athletes and lucrative sport contracts, several athletes have succumbed to using performance enhancing agents for su…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ventricular-vascular function has been observed to not appreciably differ in athletes who present with or without an EEBP.
“Moreover, ventricular-vascular function has been observed to not appreciably differ in athletes who present with or without an EEBP (49).”
From Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Workload, and the Blood Pressure Response to Exercise Testing (2022) · cites this paper as [49]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 62 · Cited by 398
- Authors
- Sharma, S., Merghani, A., & Mont, L.
- Affiliations
- St George's, University of London (GB)
- Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Sharma, S.
- Venue
- European Heart Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-04-02
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 1445-1453
- ISSN
- 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
- 1522-9645
- OpenAlex
- W2171013029
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 5.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- British Heart Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
- Keywords
- physical activity, sports cardiology, cardiovascular risk, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, cardiac hypertrophy, athlete's heart, cardiomyopathy, sudden cardiac death, arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, cardiac remodeling, performance-enhancing drugs
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart Diseases, Humans, Male, Sports, Exercise, Death, Sudden, Cardiac, Ventricular Remodeling, Cardiomegaly, Exercise-Induced
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review