CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 366Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsHeart rate and cardiovascular health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vericiguat in patients with worsening chronic heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: results of the SOluble guanylate Cyclase stimulatoR in heArT failurE patientS with PRESERVED EF (SOCRATES-PRESERVED) study

Open access
Pieske, Burkert, Maggioni, Aldo P., Lam, Carolyn S.P., Pieske-Kraigher, Elisabeth, Filippatos, Gerasimos, Butler, Javed, Ponikowski, Piotr, Shah, Sanjiv J., Solomon, Scott D., Scalise, Andrea-Viviana, Mueller, Katharina, Roessig, Lothar, Gheorghiade, Mihai·2017·European Heart Journal
DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw593PMC PMC5400074
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Aims: To determine tolerability and the optimal dose regimen of the soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator vericiguat in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods and results: SOCRATES-PRESERVED was a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind, Phase 2b dose-finding study in patients with HFpEF (ejection fraction ≥ 45%). Patients received vericiguat once daily at 1.25 or 2.5 mg fixed doses, or 5 or 10 mg titrated from a 2.5 mg starting dose, or placebo for 12 weeks. The two primary endpoints were change from baseline in log-transformed N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-ProBNP) and left atrial volume (LAV) at 12 weeks. Patients (N = 477; 48% women; mean age 73 ± 10 years; baseline atrial fibrillation 40%) were randomized within 4 weeks of HF hospitalization (75%) or outpatient treatment with intravenous diuretics for HF (25%) to vericiguat (n = 384) or placebo (n = 93). In the pooled three highest dose arms change in logNT-proBNP (vericiguat: +0.038 ± 0.782 log(pg/mL), n = 195; placebo: -0.098 ± 0.778 log(pg/mL), n = 73; one-sided P = 0.8991, two-sided P = 0.2017), and change in LAV [vericiguat: -1.7 ± 12.8 mL (n = 194); placebo: -3.4 ± 12.7 mL (n = 67), one-sided P = 0.8156, two-sided P = 0.3688] were not different from placebo. Vericiguat was well tolerated (adverse events: vericiguat 10 mg arm, 69.8%; placebo, 73.1%), with low discontinuation rates in all groups, and no changes in blood pressure at 10 mg compared with placebo. The pre-specified exploratory endpoint of Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score improved in the vericiguat 10 mg arm by mean 19.3 ± 16.3 points [median 19.8 (interquartile range 10.4-30.7)] from baseline (mean difference from placebo 9.2 points). Conclusion: Vericiguat was well tolerated, did not change NT-proBNP and LAV at 12 weeks compared with placebo but was associated with improvements in quality of life in patients with HFpEF. Given the encouraging results on quality of life, the effects of vericiguat in patients with HFpEF warrant further study, possibly with higher doses, longer follow-up and additional endpoints.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw593

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Patient flow and validity of analysis sets. Detailed reasons for exclusion from per protocol sets are provided in Supplementary material online, Table S1. BNP, B-type natriuretic peptide; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FAS, full analysis set; LAV, left atrial volume; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; SAF, safety analysis set.
Figure 1 Patient flow and validity of analysis sets. Detailed reasons for exclusion from per protocol sets are provided in Supplementary material online, Table S1. BNP, B-type natriuretic peptide; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FAS, full analysis set; LAV, left atrial volume; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; SAF, safety analysis set.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Echocardiography at rest. Full analysis set excluding patients with incorrectly assigned doses. Data are displayed as mean ± standard error. (A) E wave peak velocity antegrade flow (mitral valve early diastolic filling, Doppler echo of LV diastolic inflow pattern),*1 difference relative to placebo: 9 cm/s (95% CI 2 to 17 cm/s); (B) medial e′ (mitral valve medial annular peak early diastolic tissue velocity, tissue Doppler imaging of LV relaxation),*2 baseline-adjusted linear regression slope 0.08 cm/s (95% CI 0.02 to 0.14 cm/s); (C) lateral e′ (mitral valve lateral annular peak early diastolic tissue velocity). CI, confidence interval; LV, left ventricular.
Figure 2 Echocardiography at rest. Full analysis set excluding patients with incorrectly assigned doses. Data are displayed as mean ± standard error. (A) E wave peak velocity antegrade flow (mitral valve early diastolic filling, Doppler echo of LV diastolic inflow pattern),*1 difference relative to placebo: 9 cm/s (95% CI 2 to 17 cm/s); (B) medial e′ (mitral valve medial annular peak early diastolic tissue velocity, tissue Doppler imaging of LV relaxation),*2 baseline-adjusted linear regression slope 0.08 cm/s (95% CI 0.02 to 0.14 cm/s); (C) lateral e′ (mitral valve lateral annular peak early diastolic tissue velocity). CI, confidence interval; LV, left ventricular.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Blood pressure and heart rate at given time points. Safety analysis set excluding patients with incorrectly assigned doses. Data are displayed as mean ± standard error. (A) systolic blood pressure; (B) diastolic blood pressure; (C) heart rate, difference in heart rate between the placebo and 2.5 mg vericiguat groups at 12 weeks was −3.7 bpm (95% CI −7.32 to 0.00 bpm), and between the 10 mg and placebo groups −5.9 bpm (95% CI −10.0 to −1.9 bpm). Baseline-adjusted linear regression slope −0.34 bpm (95% CI −0.66 to −0.02 bpm). bpm, beats per minute; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 3 Blood pressure and heart rate at given time points. Safety analysis set excluding patients with incorrectly assigned doses. Data are displayed as mean ± standard error. (A) systolic blood pressure; (B) diastolic blood pressure; (C) heart rate, difference in heart rate between the placebo and 2.5 mg vericiguat groups at 12 weeks was −3.7 bpm (95% CI −7.32 to 0.00 bpm), and between the 10 mg and placebo groups −5.9 bpm (95% CI −10.0 to −1.9 bpm). Baseline-adjusted linear regression slope −0.34 bpm (95% CI −0.66 to −0.02 bpm). bpm, beats per minute; CI, confidence interval.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–365 of 365

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Pieske, B., Maggioni, A. P., Lam, C. S. P., Pieske-Kraigher, E., Filippatos, G., Butler, J., Ponikowski, P., Shah, S. J., Solomon, S. D., Scalise, A.-V., Mueller, K., Roessig, L., & Gheorghiade, M.
Affiliations
  • Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DE)
  • Associazione Nazionale Medici Cardiologi Ospedalieri (IT)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité University Medicine, Augustenburgerplatz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • Wroclaw Medical University (PL)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Bayer (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Pieske, Burkert
ORCID
Venue
European Heart Journal
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2017-03-22
Volume
38
Issue
15
Pages
1119-1127
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
DOI
10.1093/eurheartj/ehw593
PMC
PMC5400074
OpenAlex
W2603535098
Cited by
366
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 17
FWCI
29.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • AstraZeneca
  • Bayer
  • Boston Scientific Corporation
  • Bayer HealthCare
  • Daiichi-Sankyo
  • Vifor Pharma
  • Servier
  • Abbott Vascular
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart rate and cardiovascular health
Keywords
vericiguat, soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, NT-proBNP, left atrial volume, drug tolerability, dose titration, atrial fibrillation, blood pressure, diuretic therapy, heart failure hospitalization, natriuretic peptides, left ventricular ejection fraction
MeSH terms
Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase, Aged, Cardiotonic Agents, Chronic Disease, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Heart Failure, Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring, Humans, Male, Peptide Fragments, Prospective Studies, Pyrimidines, Stroke Volume, Atrial Function, Left, Treatment Outcome, Natriuretic Peptide, Brain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review