The DOI matches its Crossref record.
P2857Increase in pulse rate with semaglutide did not result in increased adverse cardiac events in subjects with type 2 diabetes in the SUSTAIN 6 cardiovascular outcomes trial
Abstract
Background: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and elevated blood pressure (BP) are commonly associated with each other. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) improve glucose control and produce small reductions in BP, but increase pulse rate. Beta-blockers, used to lower BP, are commonly used in patients with T2D; they reduce pulse rate. Semaglutide, a once-weekly GLP-1RA, has demonstrated robust reductions in cardiovascular (CV) events, HbA1c and body weight in SUSTAIN 6, a dedicated CV outcomes trial in subjects with T2D at high risk of CV events. Purpose: To evaluate the effect of semaglutide on resting pulse rate in the SUSTAIN 6 trial and the effect of background beta-blocker use on pulse rate. Additionally to assess whether the increase in pulse rate with semaglutide leads to increased adverse cardiac events. Methods: In this post hoc analysis of SUSTAIN 6, subjects were stratified by beta-blocker use at baseline and at end of trial to evaluate the effect of beta-blocker use on pulse rate.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In SUSTAIN 6, a placebo-corrected heart rate increase of 2.75 bpm was observed for semaglutide 0.5 mg, and 3.2 bpm for the 1.0 mg dosage.
“In SUSTAIN 6, a placebo-corrected heart rate increase of 2.75 beats per minute (bpm) was observed for semaglutide 0.5 mg, and 3.2 bpm for the 1.0 mg dosage”
From Safety of Semaglutide (2021) · cites this paper as [97]
This increase in heart rate was not associated with adverse cardiac events.
“This increase was not associated with adverse cardiac events.”
From Safety of Semaglutide (2021) · cites this paper as [97]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smits, M. M., & Van Raalte, D. H. (2021) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2021.645563 · Cited by 332
High-Dose Once-Weekly Semaglutide: A New Option for Obesity Management
Bradley, C. L., McMillin, S. M., Hwang, A. Y., & Sherrill, C. H. (2022) · Annals of Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1177/10600280211053867 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Seufert, J., Nauck, M., Rosenstock, J., Hansen, T., Vrazic, H., & Vilsboll, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- St. Josef-Hospital (DE)
- Dallas Diabetes Research Center (US)
- Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
- Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark
- Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Venue
- European Heart Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-08-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- suppl_1
- ISSN
- 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
- 1522-9645
- OpenAlex
- W2889468175
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen
- Novo Nordisk
- Medizinische Fakultät der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- semaglutide, type 2 diabetes, pulse rate, beta-blockers, adverse cardiac events, GLP-1 receptor agonists, SUSTAIN 6 trial, cardiovascular outcomes, blood pressure, heart rate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review