LDL TARGET IN PATIENTS WITH HIV AT HIGH CARDIOVASCULAR RISK: THE ROLE OF BEMPEDOIC ACID
Open accessAbstract
Background: Previous observational studies have shown that 70% of HIV–infected patients have clinical conditions that classify them at high or very high cardiovascular risk. Among these patients, only 12% succeed in achieving a target LDL < 55 mg/dl in accordance with the latest ESC guidelines. Aim: To evaluate the impact of bempedoic acid therapy in achieving the LDL target for HIV–infected patients. Methods: From April 2023 to September 2023, all HIV–infected patients referred to our dedicated cardiology outpatient clinic were consecutively screened. Inclusion criteria were: acquisition of informed consent, high cardiovascular risk (defined in accordance with the latest ESC guidelines), need to optimize anti–dyslipidemic therapy to achieve LDL target < 55mg/dl. Planned follow–ups were at 3 and 6 months. Clinical and laboratory data were collected in spreadsheets and analyzed with GraphPad Prism 8. Results: Thirty–two patients were enrolled, 94% male with a mean age 61±4 years. At baseline the laboratory’s data (mean ± SD) were: total cholesterol 202±50 mg/dl, LDL 130±40 mg/dl, HDL 56±15 mg/dl, triglyceride 105±24 mg/dl. The 75% of patients was on statin+ezetimibe, but only 37% of them were taking high–intensity statins. No patients reached the target of LDL < 55 mg/dl and, therefore, all patients were prescribed bempedoic acid 180 mg/day. At three months of follow–up, all patients were compliant with bempedoic acid therapy, and none reported any side effects; the laboratory monitoring of the lipid profile showed a mean LDL 80±35 mg/dl, –39% from baseline and a mean total cholesterol of 156±44 mg/dl, –26% from baseline. The 12% of patients reached LDL target < 55 mg/dl with a reduction >50% from baseline. Conclusion: The use of bempedoic acid, in addition to statin+ezetimibe therapy, or ezetimibe alone in statin–intolerant patients, reduces baseline LDL by 39% and achieves the guideline–recommended LDL target in 12% of cases with an excellent safety and tolerability profile in HIV–infected patients.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In all-comer populations with mixed statin-intolerance and varied background LLTs, LDL-C reductions with bempedoic acid ranged from 18% to 42%.
“In all-comer populations with mixed statin-intolerance and varied background LLTs, LDL-C reductions also ranged from 18% to 42% [23,26,28,30,31,33,43].”
From Systematic literature review on the real-world effectiveness and safety of bempedoic acid (2026) · cites this paper as [33]
The Results (p. 1) report a 39% mean LDL-C reduction with bempedoic acid, which falls within the cited 18%–42% range. The study enrolled only patients with HIV at high cardiovascular risk, however, so it does not establish the claim for an all-comer population or the full range of reductions. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAcross two real-world studies involving patients with varied statin tolerability, the proportion achieving LDL-C targets on bempedoic acid ranged from 12.0% reaching <55 mg/dL after 3 months to 20.5% achieving <70 mg/dL after 12 months (baseline LDL-C = 120 mg/dL for the latter).
“Across two real-world studies involving patients with varied statin tolerability, the proportion achieving LDL-C targets on bempedoic acid, ranged from 12.0% reaching <55 mg/dL [33] to 20.5% achieving <70 mg/dL (baseline LDL-C = 120 mg/dL) [23] after 3 [33], and 12 months of treatment [23].”
From Systematic literature review on the real-world effectiveness and safety of bempedoic acid (2026) · cites this paper as [33]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Systematic literature review on the real-world effectiveness and safety of bempedoic acid
Cicero, A. F. G., Cannon, C. P., Gautam, R., Anwar, S., Ghatak, A., Sarnes, E., Powell, H. A., Chhabra, R., & Jawla, S. (2026) · Atherosclerosis Plus · doi:10.1016/j.athplu.2026.100562 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…real-world studies on the use of bempedoic acid worldwide, including in the United Kingdom (n = 6) [23,27,35,37,40, 41], India (n = 4) [29,38,39,42], Italy (n = 5) [24,30,32,33,44], Germany (n = 3) [25,36,43], the United States (n = 2) [31,34] and one study each in Belgium [28] and Spain [26].”
Influential
- Authors
- Gatto, M., Moschella Orsini, F., Passarelli, I., & Antinori, A.
- Affiliations
- Istituto Nazionale per le Malattie Infettive Lazzaro Spallanzani (IT)
- Inmi "Lazzaro Spallanzani" IRCCS , Roma
- ORCID
- Venue
- European Heart Journal Supplements
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2024-04
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- Supplement_2
- Pages
- ii115-ii115
- ISSN
- 1520-765X (ISSN-L)
- 1554-2815
- OpenAlex
- W4396968735
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Heart Journal Supplements (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › HIV-related health complications and treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
- Keywords
- bempedoic acid, HIV infection, high cardiovascular risk, LDL cholesterol targets, LDL-C lowering therapy, statin intolerance, ezetimibe, lipid-lowering therapy, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular risk reduction, safety and tolerability, lipid profile monitoring, hypercholesterolemia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review