The effect of mobile health focused on diet and lifestyle on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
To determine the effect of mobile health (mHealth) focused on diet and lifestyle on blood pressure (BP). We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis using the mean difference (MD) of change from baseline as an effect measure. MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane Central, and EMBASE were reviewed until 6 May 2020. We included randomized controlled trials of adults who participated in mHealth focused on diet and lifestyle. Interventions were grouped according to the presence of health professional intervention (PI) (PI + mHealth or mHealth only). Eligible controls did not participate in mHealth and were classified as active comparator (PI) or no intervention (NI). Subgroup analyses were performed according to the presence of prior cardiovascular disease and hypertension status. We included 44 trials involving 24 692 participants. Mobile health interventions were superior to NI in reducing SBP in both situations: alone [MD = −1.8 mmHg; 95% confidence interval (CI): −3.6; 0.0] or with PI (MD = −5.3 mmHg; 95% CI: −7.5; −3.1), with a greater effect size in the latter group (P = 0.016). This benefit was not observed when the control was PI. DBP and SBP had consistent results. There was a marked effect of PI + mHealth vs. NI on the BP reduction among hypertensive participants. Current evidence shows that mHealth focused on diet and lifestyle can reduce BP, especially when implemented in hypertensive participants, and PI may provide additional benefit. PROSPERO ID CRD42019141475.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Randomized controlled trials evaluating mHealth for promoting smoking cessation, physical activity, dietary improvement, alcohol reduction, and weight loss have had inconclusive findings.
“Despite numerous randomized controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of mHealth for promoting smoking cessation, physical activity, dietary improvement, alcohol consumption reduction, and weight loss, the findings have been inconclusive.”
Cites
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · Cited by 108,283 · see citing works
Zhou, B., Bentham, J., Di Cesare, M., Bixby, H., Danaei, G., Cowan, M. J., Paciorek, C. J., Singh, G., Hajifathalian, K., Bennett, J. E., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31919-5 · Cited by 2,579 · see citing works
Self-citationPeters, J. L., Sutton, A. J., Jones, D. R., Abrams, K. R., & Rushton, L. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.010 · Cited by 2,053 · see citing works
Free, C., Phillips, G., Galli, L., Watson, L., Felix, L., Edwards, P., Patel, V., & Haines, A. (2013) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001362 · Cited by 1,766 · see citing works
Frederix, I., Caiani, E. G., Dendale, P., Anker, S., Bax, J., Böhm, A., Cowie, M., Crawford, J., de Groot, N., Dilaveris, P., et al. (2019) · European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1177/2047487319832394 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
David, C. N., Iochpe, C., Harzheim, E., Sesin, G. P., Gonçalves, M. R., Moreira, L. B., Fuchs, F. D., & Fuchs, S. C. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11081069 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“The results are influenced by various factors, including population characteristics, type of technology, lifestyle intervention, follow-up duration, health professional involvement, and comparator utilized [12,16,17].”
BackgroundSelf-citation
- Authors
- David, C. N. D., Ziegelmann, P. K., Goveia, P., Silvani, J., Silveira, L. R. P. D., & Fuchs, S. C.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
- Postgraduate Studies Program in Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul , Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350. Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, INCT PREVER, 5°. Andar, Porto Alegre 90035-003, Brazil
- Corresponding author
- David, Caroline Nespolo de
- ORCID
- Venue
- European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2022-01-25
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1142-1155
- ISSN
- 2047-4873 (ISSN-L)
- 2047-4881
- OpenAlex
- W4207082632
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel; CAPES)—Brazil—Finance (001)
- CAPES (88882.346717/2019-01)
- National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (308489/2009-8)
- Postgraduate Studies Program in Epidemiology from UFRGS and Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
- Keywords
- mobile health, diet and lifestyle intervention, blood pressure, hypertension, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, health professional intervention, cardiovascular disease, blood pressure reduction
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Pressure, Diet, Humans, Hypertension, Life Style, Telemedicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review