Effect of angiopoietin-like protein 3 inhibitors on lipid profile and other biomarkers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Open accessAbstract
Aims: Inhibition of angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3) has been proposed as a promising approach to reduce residual cardiovascular risk. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the metabolic effects of ANGPTL3 inhibitors. Methods: Databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched from inception to July 2025. Eligible studies were RCTs comparing ANGPTL3 inhibitors against placebo. Outcomes included triglycerides (TG), LDL-C, apolipoprotein B (ApoB), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C), apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1), apolipoprotein C3 (ApoC3), lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), remnant cholesterol (RC), ANGPTL3 and C-reactive protein (CRP). Pooled estimates of percentage change from baseline were obtained using fixed- and random-effects models. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the mechanism of action: monoclonal antibodies (mAbs, evinacumab), antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs, vupanorsen), and small interfering RNAs (siRNA, zodasiran and solbinsiran). Results: Nine RCTs (1254 participants) were included. ANGPTL3 inhibition significantly reduced TG (−47.1%), LDL-C (−21.6%), ApoB (−19.9%), non-HDL-C (−31.5%), TC (−32.8%), VLDL-C (−40.6%), and RC (−72.7%). Modest but consistent reductions were also observed in Lp(a) (−11.5%), ApoA1 (−18.3%), and ApoE (−16.4%). ANGPTL3 inhibitors markedly reduced circulating ANGPTL3 protein (−70.7%), with no significant effect on high-sensitivity CRP. Subgroup analyses demonstrated greater reductions in LDL-C, ApoB, non-HDL-C, and TC with evinacumab compared to the other groups, whereas small interfering RNAs produced more pronounced VLDL-C lowering compared with vupanorsen. Conclusion: ANGPTL3 inhibition offers broad lipid-lowering benefits, with particularly marked reductions in TG-rich lipoproteins.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Sterne, J. A. C., Savović, J., Page, M. J., Elbers, R. G., Blencowe, N. S., Boutron, I., Cates, C. J., Cheng, H.-Y., Corbett, M. S., Eldridge, S. M., et al. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l4898 · Cited by 33,583 · see citing works
Evinacumab in Patients with Refractory Hypercholesterolemia
Rosenson, R. S., Burgess, L. J., Ebenbichler, C. F., Baum, S. J., Stroes, E. S. G., Ali, S., Khilla, N., Hamlin, R., Pordy, R., Dong, Y., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2031049 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Rosenson, R. S., Gaudet, D., Ballantyne, C. M., Baum, S. J., Bergeron, J., Kershaw, E. E., Moriarty, P. M., Rubba, P., Whitcomb, D. C., Banerjee, P., et al. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02222-w · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Phase 1 Trial of CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Editing Targeting <i>ANGPTL3</i>
Laffin, L. J., Nicholls, S. J., Scott, R. S., Clifton, P. M., Baker, J., Sarraju, A., Singh, S., Wang, Q., Wolski, K., Xu, H., et al. (2025) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2511778 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Mach, F., Visseren, F. L. J., Cater, N. B., Salhi, N., Soronen, J., Ray, K. K., Delgado, V., Jukema, J. W., Laufs, U., Zamorano, J.-L., et al. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Lipidology · doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2024.07.001 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Xie, S., Galimberti, F., Olmastroni, E., Catapano, A. L., & Casula, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Milan (IT)
- MultiMedica (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Olmastroni, Elena
- Catapano, Alberico L
- Venue
- European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2026-04-22
- ISSN
- 2047-4873 (ISSN-L)
- 2047-4881
- OpenAlex
- W7155163785
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Ministero della Salute
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
- Keywords
- ANGPTL3, ANGPTL3 inhibitors, lipid profile, triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, remnant cholesterol, lipoprotein(a), apolipoprotein A-I, apolipoprotein E, C-reactive protein, evinacumab, siRNA, antisense oligonucleotides, monoclonal antibodies, residual cardiovascular risk, dyslipidemia management, hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review