Cited by 22Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

Budget impact analysis of a machine learning algorithm to predict high risk of atrial fibrillation among primary care patients

Open access
Szymanski, Tomasz, Ashton, Rachel, Sekelj, Sara, Petrungaro, Bruno, Pollock, Kevin G, Sandler, Belinda, Lister, Steven, Hill, Nathan R +1 more·2022·EP Europace

Abstract

Aims: We investigated whether the use of an atrial fibrillation (AF) risk prediction algorithm could improve AF detection compared with opportunistic screening in primary care and assessed the associated budget impact. Methods and results: Eligible patients were registered with a general practice in UK, aged 65 years or older in 2018/19, and had complete data for weight, height, body mass index, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure recorded within 1 year. Three screening scenarios were assessed: (i) opportunistic screening and diagnosis (standard care); (ii) standard care replaced by the use of the algorithm; and (iii) combined use of standard care and the algorithm. The analysis considered a 3-year time horizon, and the budget impact for the National Health Service (NHS) costs alone or with personal social services (PSS) costs. Scenario 1 would identify 79 410 new AF cases (detection gap reduced by 22%). Scenario 2 would identify 70 916 (gap reduced by 19%) and Scenario 3 would identify 99 267 new cases (gap reduction 27%). These rates translate into 2639 strokes being prevented in Scenario 1, 2357 in Scenario 2, and 3299 in Scenario 3. The 3-year NHS budget impact of Scenario 1 would be £45.3 million, £3.6 million (difference ‒92.0%) with Scenario 2, and £46.3 million (difference 2.2%) in Scenario 3, but for NHS plus PSS would be ‒£48.8 million, ‒£80.4 million (64.8%), and ‒£71.3 million (46.1%), respectively. Conclusion: Implementation of an AF risk prediction algorithm alongside standard opportunistic screening could close the AF detection gap and prevent strokes while substantially reducing NHS and PSS combined care costs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/europace/euac016

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Szymanski et al. estimated that ML-based AF screening in the UK could reduce NHS and Personal Social Services costs by up to -£80.4 million over three years.

    “Szymanski et al.28 further estimated that ML-based AF screening in the UK could reduce NHS and Personal Social Services (PSS) costs by up to –£80.4 million over three years28.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Szymanski, T., Ashton, R., Sekelj, S., Petrungaro, B., Pollock, K. G., Sandler, B., Lister, S., Hill, N. R., & Farooqui, U.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College Health Partners , London NW1 2FB , UK
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Pollock, Kevin G
Venue
EP Europace
Published
2022-02-28
Volume
24
Issue
8
Pages
1240-1247
ISSN
  • 1099-5129 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2092
OpenAlex
W4210434881
Cited by
22
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EP Europace (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Pfizer Ltd and Bristol Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, risk prediction algorithm, machine learning, opportunistic screening, primary care, budget impact, stroke prevention, older adults, NHS costs, personal social services, health technology assessment
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Atrial Fibrillation, Electrocardiography, Humans, Primary Health Care, State Medicine, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review