Budget impact analysis of a machine learning algorithm to predict high risk of atrial fibrillation among primary care patients
Open accessAbstract
Aims: We investigated whether the use of an atrial fibrillation (AF) risk prediction algorithm could improve AF detection compared with opportunistic screening in primary care and assessed the associated budget impact. Methods and results: Eligible patients were registered with a general practice in UK, aged 65 years or older in 2018/19, and had complete data for weight, height, body mass index, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure recorded within 1 year. Three screening scenarios were assessed: (i) opportunistic screening and diagnosis (standard care); (ii) standard care replaced by the use of the algorithm; and (iii) combined use of standard care and the algorithm. The analysis considered a 3-year time horizon, and the budget impact for the National Health Service (NHS) costs alone or with personal social services (PSS) costs. Scenario 1 would identify 79 410 new AF cases (detection gap reduced by 22%). Scenario 2 would identify 70 916 (gap reduced by 19%) and Scenario 3 would identify 99 267 new cases (gap reduction 27%). These rates translate into 2639 strokes being prevented in Scenario 1, 2357 in Scenario 2, and 3299 in Scenario 3. The 3-year NHS budget impact of Scenario 1 would be £45.3 million, £3.6 million (difference ‒92.0%) with Scenario 2, and £46.3 million (difference 2.2%) in Scenario 3, but for NHS plus PSS would be ‒£48.8 million, ‒£80.4 million (64.8%), and ‒£71.3 million (46.1%), respectively. Conclusion: Implementation of an AF risk prediction algorithm alongside standard opportunistic screening could close the AF detection gap and prevent strokes while substantially reducing NHS and PSS combined care costs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Szymanski et al. estimated that ML-based AF screening in the UK could reduce NHS and Personal Social Services costs by up to -£80.4 million over three years.
“Szymanski et al.28 further estimated that ML-based AF screening in the UK could reduce NHS and Personal Social Services (PSS) costs by up to –£80.4 million over three years28.”
From Systematic review of cost effectiveness and budget impact of artificial intelligence in healthcare (2025) · cites this paper as Szymanski et al.28
Cites
Marini, C., De Santis, F., Sacco, S., Russo, T., Olivieri, L., Totaro, R., & Carolei, A. (2005) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000166053.83476.4a · Cited by 949 · see citing works
Mobile Photoplethysmographic Technology to Detect Atrial Fibrillation
Guo, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, H., Liu, T., Liang, Z., Xia, Y., Yan, L., Xing, Y., Shi, H., Li, S., et al. (2019) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.019 · Cited by 489 · see citing works
Hobbs, F., Fitzmaurice, D., Mant, J., Murray, E., Jowett, S., Bryan, S., Raftery, J., Davies, M., & Lip, G. (2005) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta9400 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Systematic review of cost effectiveness and budget impact of artificial intelligence in healthcare
El Arab, R. A., & Al Moosa, O. A. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01722-y · Cited by 149 · see citing works
- Authors
- Szymanski, T., Ashton, R., Sekelj, S., Petrungaro, B., Pollock, K. G., Sandler, B., Lister, S., Hill, N. R., & Farooqui, U.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College Health Partners , London NW1 2FB , UK
- Bristol-Myers Squibb (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Pollock, Kevin G
- ORCID
- Venue
- EP Europace
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2022-02-28
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1240-1247
- ISSN
- 1099-5129 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2092
- OpenAlex
- W4210434881
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- EP Europace (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Pfizer Ltd and Bristol Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
- Keywords
- atrial fibrillation, risk prediction algorithm, machine learning, opportunistic screening, primary care, budget impact, stroke prevention, older adults, NHS costs, personal social services, health technology assessment
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Algorithms, Atrial Fibrillation, Electrocardiography, Humans, Primary Health Care, State Medicine, Stroke
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review