Cited by 20Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Right diaphragmatic paralysis following endocardial cryothermal ablation of inappropriate sinus tachycardia

Open access
Vatasescu, Radu, Shalganov, Tchavdar, Kardos, Attila, Jalabadze, Khatuna, Paprika, Dora, Gyorgy, Margit, Szili-Torok, Tamas·2006·EP Europace

Abstract

Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST) is a rare disorder amenable to catheter ablation when refractory to medical therapy. Radiofrequency (RF) catheter modification/ablation of the sinus node (SN) is the usual approach, although it can be complicated by right phrenic nerve paralysis. We describe a patient with IST, who had symptomatic recurrences despite previous acutely successful RF SN modifications, including the use of electroanatomical mapping/navigation system. We decided to try transvenous cryothermal modification of the SN. We used 2 min applications at -85 degrees C at sites of the earliest atrial activation guided by activation mapping during isoprenaline infusion. Every application was preceded by high output stimulation to reveal phrenic nerve proximity. During the last application, heart rate slowly and persistently fell below 85 bpm despite isoprenaline infusion, but right diaphragmatic paralysis developed. At 6 months follow-up, the patient was asymptomatic and the diaphragmatic paralysis had partially resolved. This is the first report, we believe, of successful SN modification for IST by endocardial cryoablation, although this case also demonstrates the considerable risk of right phrenic nerve paralysis even with this ablation energy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/europace/eul089

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Damage to the phrenic nerve can occur after ablation.

    “Narrowing of the superior vena cava, 94 damage to the phrenic nerve, 95 constrictive pericarditis, 96 and bradycardia 90 requiring need for a pacemaker can occur.”

    From Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (2019) · cites this paper as [95]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 20

Authors
Vatasescu, R., Shalganov, T., Kardos, A., Jalabadze, K., Paprika, D., Gyorgy, M., & Szili-Torok, T.
Affiliations
Gottsegen National Cardiovascular Center (HU)
Venue
EP Europace
Published
2006-08-03
Volume
8
Issue
10
Pages
904-906
ISSN
  • 1099-5129 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2092
OpenAlex
W2108267866
Cited by
20
References
13
Citations by year
2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EP Europace (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
inappropriate sinus tachycardia, activation mapping, atrial activation
MeSH terms
Cryosurgery, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Respiratory Paralysis, Tachycardia, Sinus, Catheter Ablation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review