Cited by 264Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesInfective Endocarditis Diagnosis and ManagementCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics

Deaths and cardiovascular injuries due to device-assisted implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and pacemaker lead extraction

Open access
Hauser, R. G., Katsiyiannis, W. T., Gornick, C. C., Almquist, A. K., Kallinen, L. M.·2010·Europace

Abstract

AIMS: An estimated 10,000-15,000 pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads are extracted annually worldwide using specialized tools that disrupt encapsulating fibrous tissue. Additional information is needed regarding the safety of the devices that have been approved for lead extraction. The aim of this study was to determine whether complications due to device-assisted lead extraction might be more hazardous than published data suggest, and whether procedural safety precautions are effective. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Manufacturers and User Defined Experience (MAUDE) database from 1995 to 2008 using the search terms 'lead extraction and death' and 'lead extraction and injury'. Additional product specific searches were performed for the terms 'death' and 'injury'. Between 1995 and 2008, 57 deaths and 48 serious cardiovascular injuries associated with device-assisted lead extraction were reported to the FDA. Owing to underreporting, the FDA database does not contain all adverse events that occurred during this period. Of the 105 events, 27 deaths and 13 injuries occurred in 2007-2008. During these 2 years, 23 deaths were linked with excimer laser or mechanical dilator sheath extractions. The majority of deaths and injuries involved ICD leads, and most were caused by lacerations of the right atrium, superior vena cava, or innominate vein. Overall, 62 patients underwent emergency surgical repair of myocardial perforations and venous lacerations and 35 (56%) survived. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that device-assisted lead extraction is a high-risk procedure and that serious complications including death may not be mitigated by emergency surgery. However, skilled standby cardiothoracic surgery is essential when performing pacemaker and ICD lead extractions. Although the incidence of these complications is unknown, the results of our study imply that device-assisted lead extractions should be performed by highly qualified physicians and their teams in specialized centres.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/europace/eup375

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 23 · Cited by 264

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. [1]Smith HJ Fearnot NE Byrd CL Wilkoff BL Love CJ Sellers TD Five years experience with intravascular lead extraction Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1994 17 2016 20 7845810
  2. [2]Byrd CL Wilkoff BL Love CJ Sellers TD Turk KT Reeves R Intravascular extraction of problematic or infected permanent pacemaker leads: 1994–1996 Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999 22 1348 57 10527016
  3. [3]Wilkoff BL Byrd CL Love CJ Hayes DL Sellers TD Schaerf R Pacemaker lead extraction with the laser sheath: results of the pacing lead extraction with the excimer sheath (PLEXES) trial J Am Coll Cardiol 1999 33 1671 6 10334441
  4. [4]Neuzil P Taborsky M Rezek Z Volpalka R Sediva L Niederle P Pacemaker and ICD lead extraction with electrosurgical dissection sheaths and standard transvenous extraction systems: results of a randomized trial Europace 2007 9 98 104 17272329
  5. [5]Love CJ Lead extraction Heart Rhythm 2007 4 1238 43 17765629
  6. [6]Dello Russo A Biddau R Pelargonio G Casella M Frontera A Camporeale A Lead extraction: a new effective tool to overcome fibrous binding sites J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2009 24 147 50 18987963
  7. [7]Hauser RG Hayes DL Increasing hazard of Sprint Fidelis implantable cardioverter lead failure Heart Rhythm 2009 6 605 10 19285920
  8. [9]Hauser RG Hayes DL Almquist AK Epstein AE Parsonnet V Tyers GFO Unexpected ICD pulse generator failure due to electronic circuit damage caused by electrical overstress Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2001 24 1046 54 11475818
  9. [10]Hauser RG Kallinen L Deaths associated with implantable cardioverter defibrillator failure and deactivation reported in the United States Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database Heart Rhythm 2004 1 399 405 15851191
  10. [11]Hauser RG Kallinen LM Almquist AK Gornick CC Katsiyiannis WT Early failure of a small-diameter high-voltage implantable cardioverter–defibrillator lead Heart Rhythm 2007 4 892 6 17599673
  11. [12]Wilkoff BL Love CJ Byrd CL Bongiorni MG Carrillo RG Crossley GH Transvenous lead extraction: Heart Rhythm Society's expert consensus on facilities, training, indications, and patient management Heart Rhythm 2009 6 1085 104 19560098
  12. [14]Feldtman RW Intravascular lead extraction using the excimer laser: pitfalls and tips for success Semin Vasc Surg 2007 21 54 6 18342737
  13. [18]Bracke FA Meijer A Van Gelder B Learning curve characteristics of pacing lead extraction with a laser sheath Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1996 21 2309 13 9825338
  14. [19]Byrd CL Wilkoff BL Love CJ Sellers TD Reiser C Clinical study of the laser sheath for lead extraction: the total experience in the United States Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002 25 804 8 12049372
  15. [21]Kennergren C Bucknall CA Butter C Charles R Fuhrer J Grosfeld M Laser assisted lead extraction: the European experience Europace 2007 9 651 6 17597078
  16. [22]Jones SO Eckart RE Albert CM Epstein LM Large, single-center, single-operator experience with transvenous lead extraction: outcomes and changing indications Heart Rhythm 2008 5 520 5 18325849
  17. [24]Roux JF Page P Dubuc M Thibault B Guerra PG Macle L Laser lead extraction: predictors of success and complications Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2007 30 214 20 17338718
  18. [25]Saad EB Saliba WI Schweikert RA AL-Khadra AS Abdul Karim A Niebauer MJ Nonthoracotomy implantable defibrillator lead extraction: results and comparison with extraction of pacemaker leads Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2003 26 1944 50 14516333
  19. [28]Henrikson CA Brinker JA How to prevent, recognize and manage complications of lead extraction. Part III: procedural factors Heart Rhythm 2008 5 1352 4 18614405
  20. [30]Naccarelli GV Conti JB DiMarco JP Tracy CM Task Force 6: training in specialized electrophysiology, cardiac pacing, and arrhythmias management: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society J Am Coll Cardiol 2006 47 904 10 16487872
  21. [31]Suga C Hayes DL Hyberger LK Lloyd MA Is there an adverse outcome from abandoned pacing leads? J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2000 4 493 9 11046188

Authors
Hauser, R. G., Katsiyiannis, W. T., Gornick, C. C., Almquist, A. K., & Kallinen, L. M.
Affiliations
Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation (US)
Corresponding author
Hauser, R. G.
Venue
Europace
Published
2009-11-27
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
395-401
ISSN
  • 1099-5129 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2092
OpenAlex
W2109852870
Cited by
264
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
FWCI
10.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • EP Europace (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Minneapolis Heart Institute
  • Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Keywords
implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads, pacemaker leads, lead extraction complications, procedural mortality, cardiovascular damage, superior vena cava injury, myocardial perforation, emergency surgical repair, cardiothoracic surgery, adverse event reporting
MeSH terms
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Electrodes, Implanted, Equipment Safety, Heart Injuries, Humans, Pacemaker, Artificial, Product Surveillance, Postmarketing, Risk Factors, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Databases, Factual, Death, Sudden, Cardiac, Defibrillators, Implantable, Equipment Failure Analysis, Prosthesis Implantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review