Cited by 275Vaccine Coverage and HesitancyRisk Perception and ManagementInfluenza Virus Research Studies

Factors in vaccination intention against the pandemic influenza A/H1N1

Open access
Setbon, M., Raude, J.·2010·The European Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Background Vaccination against pandemic influenza A/H1N1 is an effective strategy to mitigate the spread of the disease. While the vaccine is now available, social acceptance remains relatively uncertain in many societies. The purpose of this study was to examine the beliefs, attitudes and practices associated with the intention to get vaccinated against the A/H1N1 virus among the general population in France. Methods A representative sample of 1001 individuals (stratified random recruitment procedure, ages 16-90 years) was interviewed by telephone. The questionnaire included a variety of items associated with socio-demographic characteristics, risk perceptions, illness perceptions, political attitudes and worldviews as well as intention to get vaccinated. Results More than 6 out of 10 of the respondents indicated that they planned to get vaccinated when the vaccine becomes available. The same proportion of parents also reported the intention to vaccinate their children against the disease. In multiple regression analyses, socio-cognitive factors consistently predicting influenza A/H1N1 vaccination were: level of worry, risk perception and previous experience of vaccine against seasonal flu. Conclusions The factors found to predict vaccination intention and their distribution are assumed to be a consequence of the fact that people perceive the risk of swine flu to be similar to that of seasonal flu. As a result, in the absence of an increase of the risk perception of pandemic…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurpub/ckq054

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When facing a great level of uncertainty, it is challenging to think rationally and people are more vulnerable to worry and conspiracy ideas.

    “When facing a great level of uncertainty, it is challenging to think rationally and people are more vulnerable to worry and conspiracy ideas [96].”
  • In a health crisis, people have an escalated level of fear due to risks and uncertainties and can be susceptible to worry, vulnerability, or conspiracy theories.

    “The emotional appeal is especially important in the context of a health crisis, where people have an escalated level of fear due to risks and uncertainties [68] and can be susceptible to worry, vulnerability, or conspiracy theories [96].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 26 · Cited by 275

Authors
Setbon, M., & Raude, J.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique (FR)
Venue
The European Journal of Public Health
Published
2010-05-05
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
490-494
ISSN
  • 1101-1262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-360X
OpenAlex
W2155536805
Cited by
275
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
15.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
Keywords
pandemic influenza A(H1N1), vaccination intention, vaccine acceptance, risk perception, illness perception, worry
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude to Health, Child, Child, Preschool, Fear, Female, France, Humans, Infant, Influenza, Human, Influenza Vaccines, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Parents, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Logistic Models, Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype, Young Adult, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review