Cited by 24Mental Health Treatment and AccessGender, Health, and Social InequalityGender Roles and Identity Studies

Gender differences in common mental disorders: a comparison of social risk factors across four European welfare regimes

Van de Velde, Sarah, Boyd, Anders, Villagut, Gemma, Alonso, Jordi, Bruffaerts, Ronny, De Graaf, Ron, Florescu, Silvia, Haro, Josep +1 more·2019·European Journal of Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Decreasing gender differences in mental health are found largely in countries in which the roles of men and women have improved in terms of opportunities for employment, education, child care and other indicators of increasing gender equality. In this study, we examine how European welfare regimes influence this association between mental health and the social roles that men and women occupy. METHODS: The EU-World Mental Health data are used, which covers the general population in 10 European countries (n = 37 289); Countries were grouped into four welfare regions: Liberal regime (Northern Ireland), Bismarckian regime (Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands and France), Southern regime (Spain, Italy, Portugal) and Central-Eastern regime (Romania and Bulgaria). The lifetime prevalence of mood, anxiety and alcohol disorders was determined by using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview 3.0. Overall prevalence rates along with odds ratios by means of bivariate logistic regression models are calculated to compare the presence of common mental disorders in women versus men per welfare regime. RESULTS: Overall prevalence of common mental disorders is highest in the Liberal regime and lowest in the Central/Eastern regime. The gender gap in mental disorders is largest in the Southern regime and smallest in the Liberal regime. Marital status and certain employment positions help to explain variation in mental disorders across and within welfare regimes. CONCLUSION: Most prominent pathways linking gender to mental ill-health being are related to marital status and certain employment positions. However, these pathways also show substantial variation across welfare regimes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurpub/cky240

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van de Velde, S., Boyd, A., Villagut, G., Alonso, J., Bruffaerts, R., De Graaf, R., Florescu, S., Haro, J., & Kovess-Masfety, V.
Affiliations
  • Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Santé Publique (EHESP), EA4057 Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Health Services Research Unit, IMIM-Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona and CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain
  • Municipal Institute for Medical Research (ES)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • National School of Public Health, Management and Professional Development (RO)
  • Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu (ES)
Venue
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2018-11-28
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
481-487
ISSN
  • 1101-1262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-360X
OpenAlex
W2902761815
Cited by
24
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • World Mental Health
  • WMH
  • European Commission-SANCO 2008 (SANCO 20081308)
  • European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders
  • ESEMeD
  • European Commission (QLG5-1999-01042, SANCO 2004123)
  • the Piedmont Region
  • Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain (FIS 00/0028)
  • Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología, Spain (SAF 2000-158-CE)
  • Departament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (CIBER CB06/02/0046, RETICS RD06/0011 REM-TAP)
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • World Health Organization
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Keywords
gender differences in mental health, common mental disorders, welfare regimes, gender equality, social roles, marital status, employment status, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, alcoholism, lifetime prevalence, liberal welfare regime
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Employment, Europe, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Social Welfare, Prevalence, Marital Status, Health Status Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review