The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The development of polypharmacy. A longitudinal study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: To date, only a few studies have been carried out on the development and progress of polypharmacy in relation to morbidity in general practices in The Netherlands. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between an increase in long-term drug use and the incidence and severity of some chronic diseases, particularly in the elderly. METHODS: Data on medication and morbidity of 1544 elderly people were collected for the period 1994-1997 from three family practices in the medication and morbidity Registration Network of Groningen (RNG) in the northern part of The Netherlands. Polypharmacy is defined as the long-term simultaneous use of two or more drugs; long-term is defined as >240 days in a year. We looked for differences in incidences of some chronic diseases in those subgroups of the elderly in whom multiple long-term drug use respectively increased, stayed constant or did not exist. Polypharmacy at the end of the period was predicted using regression analysis. RESULTS: Polypharmacy occurred in 42% of the elderly at the end of 1997, with major polypharmacy (>5 drugs) in only 4%. The average number of drugs used long-term increased from 1.3 to 1.8 in 4 years. Predictors for the increase of polypharmacy were the number of drugs at the start, age, diabetes, coronary ischaemic diseases and use of medication without a clear indication (P < 0.005). The average number of diseases also increased, especially in the elderly who showed the greatest increase in long-term drug use; however, there was no significant difference from the groups with a slow or no increase in drug use. DISCUSSION: Polypharmacy showed a slow increase over 4 years: almost 20% of the elderly developed polypharmacy, i.e. going from no drugs or one drug to two or more drugs. Polypharmacy develops mainly in elderly patients who already use several drugs, who are known to suffer from cardiovascular diseases, diabetes or stomach symptoms, those who often take drugs (especially sedatives/hypnotics) without clear indication and those who develop hypertension or atrial fibrillation over time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fixed-Dose Combinations Improve Medication Compliance: A Meta-Analysis
Bangalore, S., Kamalakkannan, G., Parkar, S., & Messerli, F. H. (2007) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.08.033 · Cited by 1,075
Polypharmacy in older adults: a narrative review of definitions, epidemiology and consequences
Pazan, F., & Wehling, M. (2021) · European Geriatric Medicine · doi:10.1007/s41999-021-00479-3 · Cited by 542
Polypharmacy in the elderly: A literature review
Fulton, M. M., & Riley Allen, E. (2005) · Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners · doi:10.1111/j.1041-2972.2005.0020.x · Cited by 540
George, J., Elliott, R. A., & Stewart, D. C. (2008) · Drugs & Aging · doi:10.2165/00002512-200825040-00004 · Cited by 191
Loya, A. M., González-Stuart, A., & Rivera, J. O. (2009) · Drugs & Aging · doi:10.2165/00002512-200926050-00006 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Veehof, L., Stewart, R., Haaijer-Ruskamp, F., & Jong, B. M.-D.
- Venue
- Family Practice
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-06-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 261-267
- ISSN
- 0263-2136 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2229
- OpenAlex
- W2121971720
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The development of polypharmacy. A longitudinal study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/fampra/17.3.261
- The paper
- Veehof, L., Stewart, R., Haaijer-Ruskamp, F., & Jong, B. M.-D. (2000). The development of polypharmacy. A longitudinal study. Family Practice. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/17.3.261
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.