Socio-economic position and the use of preventive health care in older British women: a cross-sectional study using data from the British Women's Heart and Health Study cohort
Abstract
Background Socio-economic inequalities in health may be due to differential uptake of preventive and therapeutic medical services. Objectives To examine socio-economic position and self-reported use of six preventive services in a cohort of older British women. Methods Women randomly selected from general practice age/sex registers in 23 towns were examined from 1998 to 2001. Of all, 3652 women aged 62-83 years completed a questionnaire in 2003 assessing preventive service use. Results Women from manual social classes were less likely to have recent flu vaccinations [odds ratio (OR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74, 0.98] and dental (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.36, 0.49), eye (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67, 0.88) or chiropody examinations (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.77, 1.01). Manual social class was not related to having recent blood pressure or cholesterol checks. Conclusions Among older British women, preventive services for cardiovascular disease are not socially patterned. However, those from lower socio-economic groups are less likely to have recent flu vaccinations and dental, eye and chiropody examinations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals of lower socioeconomic status have been shown to be less likely to utilize or receive preventive care services such as cancer screening, vaccinations, eye examinations and dental examinations.
“Individuals of lower SES have also been shown to be less likely to utilize or receive preventive care services such as cancer screening, vaccinations, eye examinations and dental examinations [13,25].”
From Income disparity and utilization of cardiovascular preventive care services among U.S. adults (2021) · cites this paper as [25]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 13 · Cited by 29
- Authors
- Patel, R., Lawlor, D. A., & Ebrahim, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
- Venue
- Family Practice
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-10-18
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-10
- ISSN
- 0263-2136 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2229
- OpenAlex
- W2150000454
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Family Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
- Keywords
- socioeconomic inequalities in health, preventive medicine, older women, social class, influenza vaccination, dental care, eye examination, chiropody, cardiovascular disease prevention, blood pressure screening, cholesterol screening, British Women's Heart and Health Study
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blood Pressure Determination, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cholesterol, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Family Practice, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Foot Diseases, United Kingdom, Humans, Influenza Vaccines, Middle Aged, Preventive Health Services, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Class, Socioeconomic Factors, Vision Tests, Logistic Models, Dental Care for Aged, Women's Health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review