The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Short report: How often do UK primary care trials face recruitment delays?
Abstract
Recruitment to trials is often viewed as problematic but data are scarce. This study surveyed authors of published primary care trials to assess the scale of recruitment problems. Seventy trial authors were surveyed with a response rate of 56%. Less than one-third of trials recruited to their original timescale. Recruitment requiring GPs to gain patient consent was significantly associated with recruitment problems. The data may be useful in the wider drive to improve recruitment in primary care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Many RCTs report challenges with recruitment [4–6]”
From Parental attitudes to randomised controlled trials in primary dental care: A qualitative study (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The recruitment percentage also compares rather favorably to trial recruitment in primary care, which can be problematic in terms of duration and numbers of participants recruited as compared to the planned recruitment time and numbers of participants [56].”
From Short-term effectiveness of web-based guided self-help for phobic outpatients: randomized controlled trial. (2014) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McDonald, A. M., Knight, R. C., Campbell, M. K., Entwistle, V. A., Grant, A. M., Cook, J. A., Elbourne, D. R., Francis, D., Garcia, J., Roberts, I., et al. (2006) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-7-9 · Cited by 946
Increasing recruitment to randomised trials: a review of randomised controlled trials
Watson, J. M., & Torgerson, D. J. (2006) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-34 · Cited by 333
Foy, R. (2003) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/20.1.83 · Cited by 160
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Fairhurst K, Dowrick C. Problems with recruitment in a randomised controlled trial of counselling in general practice: causes and implications. J Health Serv Res Policy 1996; 1: 77-80.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–136 of 136
Financial impact of the hospital pharmacy’s participation in clinical trials
López-Rico, I., Vives, R., Niebla, M. C., Cerdan, C., Morón, A., Ruiz, M. A., de Pedro, V. J., & Gómez-Valent, M. (2021) · European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · doi:10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002601 · Cited by 2
Vas, A., D’sa, P., Gokhale, S., Agarwal, T., Roberts, G. L., & Mohanty, K. (2021) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.18920 · Cited by 2
Noels, E., Lugtenberg, M., Wakkee, M., Ramdas, K., Bindels, P., Nijsten, T. E. C., & van den Bos, R. R. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047745 · Cited by 1
Murphy, R., Osborne, E. L., Newhouse, N., & powell, J. A. (2025) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.24539 · Cited by 1
G, B. J. T. (2014) · Family Medicine & Medical Science Research · doi:10.4172/2327-4972.1000122 · Cited by 1
Mensah, E., Ali, K., Okorie, M., Bremner, S. A., McAlister, C., Perry, N., & Rajkumar, C. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1653643/v1 · Cited by 1
Parental attitudes to randomised controlled trials in primary dental care: A qualitative study
Coventry, H., Maguire, A., McColl, E., & Haighton, C. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0330055
Nollett, C. L., Kelson, M. J., & Hood, K. (2016) · Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1111/jebm.12212 · Cited by 1
Pharmacists as the delivery channel for adherence support in asthma
Mes, M. A. (2019) · UCL Discovery (University College London)
Gbinigie, O. A., Boylan, A. R., Butler, C., Heneghan, C. J., & Tonkin-Crine, S. K. (2022) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-022-01796-7
Cooke, S., Pennington, K., Bridle, C., & Curtis, F. (2023) · Diabetology · doi:10.3390/diabetology4020016
Elfghi, M., Jordan, F., Sultan, S., & Tawfick, W. A. (2023) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-023-07727-w
Юрочко, Т. П., Шевченко, М. В., Maltseva, K., & Парастивюк, Є. М. (2023) · Таврійський науковий вісник Серія Публічне управління та адміністрування · doi:10.32782/tnv-pub.2023.6.16
Mensah, E., Ali, K., Okorie, M., Bremner, S. A., McAlister, C., Perry, N., & Rajkumar, C. (2024) · Current Hypertension Reviews · doi:10.2174/0115734021299574240809114921
Nordling, P., Nwaru, C. A., Nordeman, L., Skoglund, I., Larsson, M. E. H., Björkelund, C., & Hensing, G. K. E. (2024) · Primary Health Care Research & Development · doi:10.1017/s1463423624000574
Tew, M., Catchpool, M., Furler, J., Rue, K. D. L., Clarke, P., Manski-Nankervis, J.-A., & Dalziel, K. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.22624048
Tew, M., Catchpool, M., Furler, J., Rue, K. D. L., Clarke, P., Manski-Nankervis, J.-A., & Dalziel, K. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.22624054
Moffat, K. R., Shi, W., Cannon, P., & Sullivan, F. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.22616204
Moffat, K. R., Shi, W., Cannon, P., & Sullivan, F. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.22616201
Moffat, K. R., Shi, W., Cannon, P., & Sullivan, F. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.22616207
Tew, M., Catchpool, M., Furler, J., Rue, K. D. L., Clarke, P., Manski-Nankervis, J.-A., & Dalziel, K. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.22624051
Tew, M., Catchpool, M., Furler, J., Rue, K. D. L., Clarke, P., Manski-Nankervis, J.-A., & Dalziel, K. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.22624042
Gbinigie, O. A., Boylan, A.-M., Butler, C. C., Heneghan, C. J., & Tonkin-Crine, S. K. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.20382024
Gbinigie, O. A., Boylan, A.-M., Butler, C. C., Heneghan, C. J., & Tonkin-Crine, S. K. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.20382036
Al, P., Hey, S. P., Weijer, C., Gillies, K., McCleary, N., Yee, M.-L., Inglis, J., Presseau, J., & Brehaut, J. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26578199
Tew, M., Catchpool, M., Furler, J., Rue, K. D. L., Clarke, P., Manski-Nankervis, J.-A., & Dalziel, K. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.22624045
Moffat, K. R., Shi, W., Cannon, P., & Sullivan, F. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.22616213
Gbinigie, O. A., Boylan, A.-M., Butler, C. C., Heneghan, C. J., & Tonkin-Crine, S. K. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.20382030
Moffat, K. R., Shi, W., Cannon, P., & Sullivan, F. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.22616222
Gbinigie, O. A., Boylan, A.-M., Butler, C. C., Heneghan, C. J., & Tonkin-Crine, S. K. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.20382027
Moffat, K. R., Shi, W., Cannon, P., & Sullivan, F. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.22616210
Gbinigie, O. A., Boylan, A.-M., Butler, C. C., Heneghan, C. J., & Tonkin-Crine, S. K. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.20382033
Moffat, K. R., Shi, W., Cannon, P., & Sullivan, F. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.22616219
Al, P., Hey, S. P., Weijer, C., Gillies, K., McCleary, N., Yee, M.-L., Inglis, J., Presseau, J., & Brehaut, J. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26578202
Moffat, K. R., Shi, W., Cannon, P., & Sullivan, F. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.22616216
The preservation of childrenʼs oncofertility program “Snowflake”. First results
Kulyova, S. A., Карицкий, А. П., Lavrinovich, O., Берлев, И. В., & Татищева, Ю. А. (2026) · Russian Journal of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology · doi:10.21682/2311-1267-2026-13-1-39-44
Metadata
- Authors
- Bower, P., Wilson, S., & Mathers, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- ORCID
- Bower, P.
- Venue
- Family Practice
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-11-13
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 601-603
- ISSN
- 0263-2136 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2229
- OpenAlex
- W2131015924
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 4.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Family Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- trial recruitment, general practitioners, patient consent
- MeSH terms
- Data Collection, United Kingdom, Humans, Time Factors, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Patient Selection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review