Cited by 215Bacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyStreptococcal Infections and TreatmentsBiochemical and Structural Characterization

Bacterial Glycobiology: Rhamnose-Containing Cell Wall Polysaccharides in Gram-Positive Bacteria

Open access
Mistou, Michel-Yves, Sutcliffe, Iain C., van Sorge, Nina M.·2016·FEMS Microbiology Reviews

Abstract

The composition of the Gram-positive cell wall is typically described as containing peptidoglycan, proteins and essential secondary cell wall structures called teichoic acids, which comprise approximately half of the cell wall mass. The cell walls of many species within the genera Streptococcus, Enterococcus and Lactococcus contain large amounts of the sugar rhamnose, which is incorporated in cell wall-anchored polysaccharides (CWP) that possibly function as homologues of well-studied wall teichoic acids (WTA). The presence and chemical structure of many rhamnose-containing cell wall polysaccharides (RhaCWP) has sometimes been known for decades. In contrast to WTA, insight into the biosynthesis and functional role of RhaCWP has been lacking. Recent studies in human streptococcal and enterococcal pathogens have highlighted critical roles for these complex polysaccharides in bacterial cell wall architecture and pathogenesis. In this review, we provide an overview of the RhaCWP with regards to their biosynthesis, genetics and biological function in species most relevant to human health. We also briefly discuss how increased knowledge in this field can provide interesting leads for new therapeutic compounds and improve biotechnological applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/femsre/fuw006

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CW-PS contain rhamnose and have multiple functions; in S. thermophilus they are involved in antibiotic stress response, while in Lact. lactis they act as phage receptors.

    “These molecules contain rhamnose and have multiple functions. In S. thermophilus, they are involved in antibiotic stress response, while in Lact. Lactis, they act as phage receptors [21,22,23].”

    From Lactic Acid Bacteria Exopolysaccharides Producers: A Sustainable Tool for Functional Foods (2021) · cites this paper as [21]

    The ‘RhaCWP as phage receptors’ section (page unavailable) supports the Lactococcus lactis claim: it says RhaCWP structure dictates bacteriophage sensitivity and discusses phage adsorption in that species. The paper also describes rhamnose-containing cell-wall polysaccharides and their multiple roles. It does not establish an antibiotic stress-response role in S. thermophilus; the antibiotic discussion concerns other bacteria or a proposed synergy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 168 · Cited by 215

Authors
Mistou, M.-Y., Sutcliffe, I. C., & van Sorge, N. M.
Affiliations
  • Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail (FR)
  • Northumbria University (GB)
Venue
FEMS Microbiology Reviews
Published
2016-03-13
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
464-479
ISSN
  • 0168-6445 (ISSN-L)
  • 1574-6976
OpenAlex
W2299259157
Cited by
215
References
168
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • FEMS Microbiology Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Streptococcal Infections and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
Keywords
Gram-positive bacteria, wall teichoic acid, rhamnose biosynthesis, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Lactococcus, bacterial pathogenesis, cell wall architecture, therapeutic target, biotechnology applications
MeSH terms
Cell Wall, Gram-Positive Bacteria, Humans, Polysaccharides, Bacterial, Rhamnose, Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review