The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biomass Estimation for Temperate Broadleaf Forests of the United States Using Inventory Data
Open accessAbstract
A potentially valuable data source for estimating forest biomass is forest volume inventory data that are widely collected and available throughout the world. In this paper we present a general methodology for using such data to reliably estimate aboveground biomass density (AGBD) and to develop expansion factors for converting volume directly to AGBD from USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data. Growing stock volume inventory data and stand tables were combined with independently developed biomass regression equations to estimate AGBD and to calculate biomass expansion factors (BEF: factors that convert volume to mass, accounting for noncommercial components) for the extensive oak-hickory and maple-beech-birch forest types of the eastern United States. Estimated aboveground biomass for both forest types ranged between 28 and 200 Mg ha-1. Expansion factors decreased from more than 4.0 at low growing stock volume to nearly 1.0 when growing stock volume was as high as 190 m³ ha-1, consistent with theoretical expectations. In stands with low AGBD (< 50 Mg ha-1), small diameter trees (< 10 cm diameter) contained up to 75% of the AGBD in trees ≥ 10 cm diameter; this proportion dropped to < 10% for stands with AGBD > 175 Mg ha-1. The similarity of our results for two major forest types suggests that they may be generally applicable for estimating AGBD from inventory data for other temperate broadleaf forests. Further, the pattern between BEF and stand volume was similar to that obtained for tropical broadleaf forests, except that tropical forests generally had larger BEFs than temperate forests at a given volume. The implications of these results suggest that a recent assessment of forest biomass in developed countries is too low. For. Sci.: 43(32):424-434.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lehtonen, A., Mäkipää, R., Heikkinen, J., Sievänen, R., & Liski, J. (2004) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2003.07.008 · Cited by 438
Fang, J., Guo, Z., Hu, H., Kato, T., Muraoka, H., & Son, Y. (2014) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12512 · Cited by 313
Carbon sequestration in the U.S. forest sector from 1990 to 2010
Woodbury, P. B., Smith, J. E., & Heath, L. S. (2007) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.12.008 · Cited by 287
Segura, M., & Kanninen, M. (2005) · Biotropica · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.02027.x · Cited by 256
Successional diversity and forest ecosystem function
Caspersen, J. P., & Pacala, S. W. (2001) · Ecological Research · doi:10.1046/j.1440-1703.2001.00455.x · Cited by 181
Metadata
- Authors
- Schroeder, P., Brown, S., Mo, J., Birdsey, R., & Cieszewski, C.
- Venue
- Forest Science
- Published
- 1997-08-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 424-434
- ISSN
- 0015-749X (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3738
- OpenAlex
- W171017463
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biomass Estimation for Temperate Broadleaf Forests of the United States Using Inventory Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/forestscience/43.3.424
- The paper
- Schroeder, P., Brown, S., Mo, J., Birdsey, R., & Cieszewski, C. (1997). Biomass Estimation for Temperate Broadleaf Forests of the United States Using Inventory Data. Forest Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/43.3.424
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.