The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE NATURE OF NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE DIVERGENCE BETWEEN BARLEY AND MAIZE CHLOROPLAST DNA
Abstract
Analysis of a 2175-base pair (bp) SmaI-HindIII fragment of barley chloroplast DNA revealed that rbcL (the gene for the large subunit of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase) and atpB (the gene for the β subunit of ATPase) are transcribed divergently and are separated by an untranscribed region of 155-166 bp. The rbcL mRNA has a 320-residue untranslated leader region, whereas the atpB mRNA has a 296- to 309-residue leader region. The sequence of these regions, together with the initial 113 bp of the atpB-coding region and the initial 1279 bp of the rbcL-coding region, is compared with the analogous maize chloroplast DNA sequences. Two classes of nucleotide differences are present, substitutions and insertions/deletions. Nucleotide substitutions show a 1.9-fold bias toward transitions in the rbcL-coding region and a 1.5-fold bias toward transitions in the noncoding region. The level of nucleotide substitutions between the barley and maize sequences is about 0.065/bp. Seventy-one percent of the substitutions in the rbcL-coding region are at the third codon position, and 95% of these are synonymous changes. Insertion/deletion events, which are confined to the noncoding regions, are not randomly distributed in these regions and are often associated with short repeated sequences. The extent of change for the noncoding regions (about 0.093 events/bp) is less than the extent of change at the third codon positions in the rbcL-coding region (about 0.135 events/bp), including insertion/delection events. Limited sequence analysis of the analogous DNA from a wild line (Hordeum spontaneum) and a primitive Iranian barley (H. vulgare) suggested a low rate of chloroplast DNA evolution. Compared to spinach chloroplast DNA, the barley rbcL-atpB untranslated region is extremely diverged, with only the putative rbcL promoters and ribosome-binding site being extensively conserved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A rapid method for determining sequences in DNA by primed synthesis with DNA polymerase
Sanger, F., & Coulson, A. R. (1975) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(75)90213-2 · Cited by 2,709
Cited by
Plant mitochondrial DNA evolved rapidly in structure, but slowly in sequence
Palmer, J. D., & Herbon, L. A. (1988) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02143500 · Cited by 759
Contributions of PCR-Based Methods to Plant Systematics and Evolutionary Biology
Wolfe, A. D., & Liston, A. (1998) · Molecular Systematics of Plants II · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5419-6_2 · Cited by 411
Molecular Markers in Phylogenetic Studies-A Review
Amit Roy, S. R. (2014) · Journal of Phylogenetics & Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.4172/2329-9002.1000131 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Zurawski, G., Clegg, M. T., & Brown, A. H. D.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1984-04-01
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 735-749
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2100486945
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE NATURE OF NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE DIVERGENCE BETWEEN BARLEY AND MAIZE CHLOROPLAST DNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/106.4.735
- The paper
- Zurawski, G., Clegg, M. T., & Brown, A. H. D. (1984). THE NATURE OF NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE DIVERGENCE BETWEEN BARLEY AND MAIZE CHLOROPLAST DNA. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/106.4.735
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.