The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
GENE GENEALOGY AND VARIANCE OF INTERPOPULATIONAL NUCLEOTIDE DIFFERENCES
Open accessAbstract
A mathematical theory is developed for computing the probability that m genes sampled from one population (species) and n genes sampled from another are derived from l genes that existed at the time of population splitting. The expected time of divergence between the two most closely related genes sampled from two different populations and the time of divergence (coalescence) of all genes sampled are studied by using this theory. It is shown that the time of divergence between the two most closely related genes can be used as an approximate estimate of the time of population splitting (T) only when T ≡ t/(2 N) is small, where t and N are the number of generations and the effective population size, respectively. The variance of Nei and Li's estimate (d) of the number of net nucleotide differences between two populations is also studied. It is shown that the standard error (sd) of d is larger than the mean when T is small (T << 1). In this case, sd is reduced considerably by increasing sample size. When T is large (T > 1), however, a large proportion of the variance of d is caused by stochastic factors, and increase in the sample size does not help to reduce sd. To reduce the stochastic variance of d, one must use data from many independent unlinked gene loci.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination
Watterson, G. A. (1975) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(75)90020-9 · Cited by 3,915
Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins.
ZUCKERKANDL, E., & PAULING, L. (1965) · Evolving Genes and Proteins · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-2734-4.50017-6 · Cited by 3,020
On the genealogy of large populations
Kingmán, J. F. C. (1982) · Journal of Applied Probability · doi:10.1017/s0021900200034446 · Cited by 1,628
Kimura, M. (1969) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/61.4.893 · Cited by 817
TESTING THE CONSTANT-RATE NEUTRAL ALLELE MODEL WITH PROTEIN SEQUENCE DATA
Hudson, R. R. (1983) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb05528.x · Cited by 342
Lines of descent in the diffusion approximation of neutral Wright-Fisher models
Griffiths, R. (1980) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(80)90013-1 · Cited by 148
Nucleotide sequence comparison of the Adh gene in three drosophilids
Cohn, V. H., Thompson, M. A., & Moore, G. P. (1984) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02101983 · Cited by 48
Cited by
Kishino, H., & Hasegawa, M. (1989) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02100115 · Cited by 3,373
Relationships between gene trees and species trees.
(1988) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040517 · Cited by 1,622
Hey, J., & Nielsen, R. (2004) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.103.024182 · Cited by 1,442
Bryant, D., Bouckaert, R., Felsenstein, J., Rosenberg, N. A., & RoyChoudhury, A. (2012) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/mss086 · Cited by 965
Delimiting Species without Monophyletic Gene Trees
Knowles, L. L., & Carstens, B. C. (2007) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150701701091 · Cited by 788
Metadata
- Authors
- Takahata, N., & Nei, M.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1985-06-01
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 325-344
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2117715276
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GENE GENEALOGY AND VARIANCE OF INTERPOPULATIONAL NUCLEOTIDE DIFFERENCES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/110.2.325
- The paper
- Takahata, N., & Nei, M. (1985). GENE GENEALOGY AND VARIANCE OF INTERPOPULATIONAL NUCLEOTIDE DIFFERENCES. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/110.2.325
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.