The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular population genetics of mtDNA size variation in crickets.
Open accessAbstract
Nucleotide sequence analysis of a region of cricket (Gryllus firmus) mtDNA showing discrete length variation revealed tandemly repeated sequences 220 base pairs (bp) in length. The repeats consist of 206 bp sequences bounded by the dyad symmetric sequence 5'GGGGGCATGCCCCC3'. The sequence data showed that mtDNA size variation in this species is due to variation in the number of copies of tandem repeats. Southern blot analysis was used to document the frequency of crickets heteroplasmic for two or more different-sized mtDNAs. In New England populations of G. firmus and a close relative Gryllus pennsylvanicus approximately 60% of the former and 45% of the latter were heteroplasmic. From densitometry of autoradiographs the frequencies of mtDNA size classes were determined for the population samples and are shown to very different in the two species. However, in populations where hybridization between the two species has occurred, the frequencies of size classes and cytoplasmic genotypes in each species' distinct mtDNA lineage were shifted in a manner suggesting nuclear-cytoplasmic interactions. The data were applied to reported diversity indices and hierarchical statistics. The hierarchical statistics indicated that the greatest proportion of variation for mtDNA size was due to variation among individuals in their cytoplasmic genotypes (heteroplasmic or homoplasmic state). The diversity indices were used to estimate a per-generation mutation rate for size variants of 10(-4). The data are discussed in light of the relationship between genetic drift and mutation in maintaining variation for mtDNA size.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Frameshift Mutations and the Genetic Code
Streisinger, G., Okada, Y., Emrich, J., Newton, J., Tsugita, A., Terzaghi, E., & Inouye, M. (1966) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1966.031.01.014 · Cited by 1,400
Cited by
Inheritance and recombination of mitochondrial genomes in plants, fungi and animals
Barr, C. M., Neiman, M., & Taylor, D. R. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01492.x · Cited by 382
The Units of Selection on Mitochondrial DNA
Rand, D. M. (2001) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114109 · Cited by 359
Self-citationLength heteroplasmy of sturgeon mitochondrial DNA: an illegitimate elongation model.
Buroker, N. E., Brown, J. R., Gilbert, T. A., O'Hara, P. J., Beckenbach, A. T., Thomas, W. K., & Smith, M. J. (1990) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/124.1.157 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Rand, D. M., & Harrison, R. G.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989-03-01
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 551-569
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2171596181
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular population genetics of mtDNA size variation in crickets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/121.3.551
- The paper
- Rand, D. M., & Harrison, R. G. (1989). Molecular population genetics of mtDNA size variation in crickets. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/121.3.551
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.