The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using selected overlapping recombinant chromosomes, in an interspecies cross of tomato.
Open accessAbstract
Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) have been mapped to small intervals along the chromosomes of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), by a method we call substitution mapping. The size of the interval to which a QTL can be mapped is determined primarily by the number and spacing of previously mapped genetic markers in the region surrounding the QTL. We demonstrate the method using tomato genotypes carrying chromosomal segments from Lycopersicon chmielewskii, a wild relative of tomato with high soluble solids concentration but small fruit and low yield. Different L. chmielewskii chromosomal segments carrying a common restriction fragment length polymorphism were identified, and their regions of overlap determined using all available genetic markers. The effect of these chromosomal segments on soluble solids concentration, fruit mass, yield, and pH, was determined in the field. Many overlapping chromosomal segments had very different phenotypic effects, indicating QTLs affecting the phenotype(s) to lie in intervals of as little as 3 cM by which the segments differed. Some associations between different traits were attributed to close linkage between two or more QTLs, rather than pleiotropic effects of a single QTL: in such cases, recombination should separate desirable QTLs from genes with undesirable effects. The prominence of such trait associations in wide crosses appears partly due to infrequent reciprocal recombination between heterozygous chromosomal segments flanked by homozygous regions. Substitution mapping is particularly applicable to gene introgression from wild to domestic species, and generally useful in narrowing the gap between linkage mapping and physical mapping of QTLs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Genetic Architecture of Quantitative Traits
Mackay, T. F. C. (2001) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.35.102401.090633 · Cited by 1,106
Genetic mapping of floral traits associated with reproductive isolation in monkeyflowers (Mimulus)
Bradshaw, H. D., Wilbert, S. M., Otto, K. G., & Schemske, D. W. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/376762a0 · Cited by 416
The candidate gene approach in plant genetics: a review
Pflieger, S., Lefebvre, V., & Causse, M. (2001) · Molecular Breeding · doi:10.1023/a:1011605013259 · Cited by 332
Hung, H.-Y., Shannon, L. M., Tian, F., Bradbury, P. J., Chen, C., Flint-Garcia, S. A., McMullen, M. D., Ware, D., Buckler, E. S., Doebley, J. F., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1203189109 · Cited by 332
Kianian, S. F., & Quiros, C. F. (1992) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf00224150 · Cited by 217
Metadata
- Authors
- Paterson, A. H., DeVerna, J. W., Lanini, B., & Tanksley, S. D.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990-03-01
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 735-742
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W1948344039
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using selected overlapping recombinant chromosomes, in an interspecies cross of tomato. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/124.3.735
- The paper
- Paterson, A. H., DeVerna, J. W., Lanini, B., & Tanksley, S. D. (1990). Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using selected overlapping recombinant chromosomes, in an interspecies cross of tomato. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/124.3.735
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.