The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polymorphism and divergence in the Mst26A male accessory gland gene region in Drosophila.
Abstract
Drosophila males, like males of most other insects, transfer a group of specific proteins to the females during mating. These proteins are produced primarily in the accessory gland and are likely to influence the female's reproduction. The results of studies of DNA sequence polymorphism and divergence in two genes coding for male accessory gland proteins of Drosophila are reported here. The Mst26Aa and Mst26Ab transcription units are tandemly arranged in a approximately 1.6-kb segment in Drosophila sechellia, Drosophila mauritiana and Drosophila simulans as they were reported to be in Drosophila melanogaster. The DNA sequences of 10 alleles from D. melanogaster and one allele each from the three sibling species reveals a high degree of amino acid replacement variation. A substantial part of the variation is due to insertion/deletion differences. Possible functional significance of these amino acid sequence changes is discussed. Statistical analyses based on the neutral theory of molecular evolution show that the distribution of polymorphism over the 1.6-kb region is inconsistent with the pattern of divergence between the species. The amount of 4-cutter restriction map polymorphism in a larger sample of 75 alleles from the same D. melanogaster population is similar to that obtained from the DNA sequence of the 10 alleles (a pairwise average of 0.007 difference per site). The 6-cutter restriction map survey of a 18-kb region containing the Mst26A genes indicates that polymorphism in the region flanking these genes maybe higher. The failure of polymorphisms and divergence in the Mst26A region to conform to the expectations of a simple mutation-drift-equilibrium model indicates that selection in or near this region has played a role in the history of these genes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolution of Protein Molecules
JUKES, T. H., & CANTOR, C. R. (1969) · Mammalian Protein Metabolism · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7 · Cited by 11,032
Cited by
Hitchhiking Under Positive Darwinian Selection
Fay, J. C., & Wu, C.-I. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/155.3.1405 · Cited by 1,819
LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS ON SPECIATION: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED IN 40 YEARS?
Rice, W. R., & Hostert, E. E. (1993) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01257.x · Cited by 1,016
Evolutionary EST analysis identifies rapidly evolving male reproductive proteins in Drosophila
Swanson, W. J., Clark, A. G., Waldrip-Dail, H. M., Wolfner, M. F., & Aquadro, C. F. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.131568198 · Cited by 522
Intraspecific nuclear DNA variation in Drosophila
Moriyama, E. N., & Powell, J. R. (1996) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025563 · Cited by 419
The Population Genetics of the Origin and Divergence of the Drosophila simulans Complex Species
Kliman, R. M., Andolfatto, P., Coyne, J. A., Depaulis, F., Kreitman, M., Berry, A. J., McCarter, J., Wakeley, J., & Hey, J. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/156.4.1913 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Aguadé, M., Miyashita, N., & Langley, C. H.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-11-01
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 755-770
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2125496536
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polymorphism and divergence in the Mst26A male accessory gland gene region in Drosophila. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/132.3.755
- The paper
- Aguadé, M., Miyashita, N., & Langley, C. H. (1992). Polymorphism and divergence in the Mst26A male accessory gland gene region in Drosophila. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/132.3.755
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.